Slow Hermione?

[javalorum]

No: HPFGUIDX 174849

"Steve" <bboyminn at ...> wrote:
> 
> Dumbledore continues to explain that he did not want
> Harry to discover the nature and existence of the
> Hallows until just the right time, so Harry's 
> 'hot head' would not overrule his 'good heart'.
> 

Java:
I'm sure this has been brought up before. Did Dumbledore said why he 
couldn't take out Voldie himself? I still don't get this. I know it's 
basic. Does Dumbledore just like making elaborate schemes so much, 
likes being the wise sage in the background, that he would rather 
kill himself to let somebody else gets all the credit? He's supposed 
to be a way better wizard. Even if Harry has all the blood advantage, 
Dumbledore still has a better chance at beating Voldemort. If only if 
he had thought about destroying Voldemort himself, (instead of 
reading too much LoTR and prefers to be Gandalf instead of Frodo,) 
I'm sure he'd have made a perfect plan to do so. He's that good.

I know this is a story about Harry. But it's kind of boring that all 
Harry does (starting with book 5) is trying to figure out the massive 
puzzle Dumbledore leaves him. Voldemort is merely a tool for the 
teacher-pupil pair to experiment on.