The Malfoys (was Re: good and bad slytherins/Disappointment and Responsibility)
va32h
va32h at comcast.net
Fri Aug 10 16:39:32 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 175031
I've been having a variety of thoughts about the Malfoys latelys -
this seems as good a jumping off point as any to discuss them.
On another HP board I visit, a fellow poster suggested that Voldemort
particularly enjoys torturing the Malfoys because they represent (to
Voldy) all that he thought he should have been. Wealthy, well-
connected, a pampered prince like Draco. In short - the Malfoys are
the wizarding equivalent of the Riddle family that had so thoroughly
rejected Voldemort.
My addition to that was that while young Voldemort took a certain raw
vengeance in slaughtering that family, the older Voldy sees that it's
much more fun to torture the Malfoys slowly, rather than kill them
outright. Their punishments weren't too dreadful - they lost their
house, Voldemort allows his pet to eat off their table, Draco is
forced to torture people, Lucius must relinquish his wand (and
symbolically his manhood, is how I read that scene). But still -
compared to other examples of Voldemort's wrath, they got off pretty
easily. But they would know that too, and were probably driving
themselves crazy wondering how and when the "real" punishment would
take place. Which Voldemort would have found wildly entertaining.
I have long suspected though, that the elder Malfoys were pretty
happy that Voldemort had disappeared all those years ago. Lucius had
done very well for himself in the interim, and really had nothing to
gain and very much to lose if Voldemort returned. My suspicion was
that Lucius knew the diary was *something* that could bring Voldemort
back, and snuck it in to Hogwarts in at least subconscious hopes
that it would quickly be found and destroyed.
Terri said:
> I'm not sure why people think that Malfoys being in the Hall shows
that they have changed. IMO, they simply choose the winners side
again. They were out of favour with Voldemort and that, IMO again,
is why they tried to help Harry. They are still as self serving as
ever. Lucius did some very cruel and horrible things both times he
went to the dark lord. One act does not a personality make. You
need to look at the balance of their lives and in the balance, they
are mean, selfserving and cruel. It is totally in their character to
jump ship when it isn't going their way, not a change for the
better. They do not have the courage of their convictions.
va32h:
After Voldemort's return, Lucius would have to conclude that he's
pretty well screwed. The diary is destroyed but Voldemort still came
back - oh crap. Voldemort is even more powerful that Lucius thought
*and* Lucius lost the diary. So he has two choices - go to the
Ministry and hope they can protect him, or try to get back in
Voldemort's good graces. Given what we know of Fudge, attempting to
lie to Voldemort seems a safer option than hoping Fudge can protect
him. Complicating matters, Draco has developed a hero-worship of
Voldemort (much like Regulus did) and won't shut up about how
powerful his family is in the DE.
I would further guess that Lucius was relieved to be sent to Azkaban,
where he is at least free from Voldemort. Narcissa then took up the
cause of subtly defying Voldemort. She sneaks off to visit Snape, at
great personal risk. Draco has also come to deeply regret any Malfoy
involvement with Voldemort in HBP. His first to attempts to kill
Dumbledore were pathetic, he's practically begging to be caught.
Throughout DH, what we see of the Malfoys is that they are just
trying to lay low and figure out a way out of their situation. And
when they do see it - Narcissa jumps at it. There is no guarantee
that Not!Dead!Harry is going to win his ultimate showdown with
Voldemort, and if he does lose - Voldemort is not going to give
Narcissa a big hug and say "you sure pulled a fast one on me,
sweetie!". She's taken a very big risk in lying to LV.
So it took 7 books for the Malfoys to summon up the nerve to
flagrantly defy Voldemort. Well they don't have that Potter raw
courage. But they still show growth IMO. Are they motivated by
personal safety?
Yes, they are but then again - Harry is extremely motivated by
personal reasons as well. As per his discussion with Dumbledore in
HBP, the primary reason that Harry will continue to pursue Voldemort
is because Voldemort killed his parents. (oh and a bunch of other
people too, which Harry acknowledges), but first and foremost its
because Voldemort killed his parents. When Dumbledore points out that
Harry has never been tempted by the dark side, Harry says "Of course
not! Voldemort killed my parents!"
Molly jumps in to duel Bellatrix why? Because Bellatrix is a baddie
and Molly is a goodie of course, but Molly's stated reason is "NOT MY
DAUGHTER..."
Lupin and Sirius want to kill Pettigrew because he betrayed their
friend, Harry wants to kill Snape because Snape killed Dumbledore,
Ron wants to go kill Death Eaters because they killed his brother.
But as Hermione wisely points out - you can achieve your personal
revenge will simultaneously working toward a larger goal. Ron can
kill Death Eaters on his way to finding the snake.
Or in the case of the Malfoys - you can look out for your own family
while working toward a larger goal of getting rid of the guy who is
giving your family such a hard time. I doubt the Malfoys really had a
grand plan to get rid of Voldemort - but I won't discount their
contribution towards that end, just because their motives weren't
entirely altruisic.
va32h
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive