Of Sorting and Snape
Judy
judy at judyshapiro.com
Sun Aug 12 10:50:08 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 175161
Ah, the end of the series doesn't mean the end of the debate between
Snape's supporters and detractors!
Prep0strus (in post #175139) says, of James & Sirius bullying Snape:
> Snape isn't an entirely innocent victim. He's a boy practicing
> dark arts
Well, Snape is certainly not an innocent by his late teens or so,
since he's joined the Death Eaters. However, you are making some
statements here that are not based in canon. You say that Snape
is "practicing the Dark Arts" and imply that he does so even as a
boy, even during the time when Lily is friends with him. The fact is,
though, that we hardly ever see Snape practicing the Dark Arts in
canon at all, and certainly not as a boy (unless you want to count
killing flies, which we see him doing once.) We see him cast
Sectumsempra once as an adult, but here he is actually trying to save
Lupin from a Death Eater. That is the extent of the Dark Arts that we
actually see Snape USE.
In fact, we don't really even hear *about* Snape using the Dark Arts.
For example, in the Pensieve trial scene in GoF, Karkaroff accuses
various Death Eaters of horrible things torturing muggles,
murdering wizards, using the Imperius Curse. But, when he gets to
accusing Snape, all he says is that Snape was a Death Eater. Even
when Crouch Sr. doesn't believe that Snape is a Death Eater,
Karkaroff doesn't back it up with an examples of what Snape has done.
He just says, "I tell you, Snape is a Death Eater!" Moody, watching
the proceedings, whispers to Dumbledore about various things other
Death Eaters have done, but all he does when Snape is mentioned is
look skeptical about Snape's being on Dumbledore's side. Lupin does
mention that Sectumsempra was a specialty of Snape's, but we don't
know if that means Snape used it a lot, or if it means instead that
Lupin is aware that Snape invented the spell. That's about it in
canon for Snape using the Dark Arts. Compare that to, say, how much
Dark Arts we see Voldemort or Bellatrix performing.
Now, what we do see in canon is that Snape is knowledgeable about the
Dark Arts -- fascinated by them, in fact. But, knowing the Dark Arts
is not the same as using them. In fact, long before we know of
Dumbledore's friendship with Grindelwald, we see two professors
(McGonagall and Binns) stating (or at least implying) that Dumbledore
is quite knowledgeable in the Dark Arts.
I think this is where some of the divergent views of Snape come in.
Snape is clearly described, by Sirius at least, as being fascinated
by the Dark Arts even as an eleven-year old. Some readers take that
to mean that Snape was always a Dark Wizard, even as a child. I don't
see it that way. Snape has always struck me as someone motivated by
a love of knowledge, as someone whose ambition is to LEARN about
magic, especially the mysterious, enigmatic, forbidden Dark Arts. In
other words, Professor Snape, with his sitting room walls (even the
doors) covered completely with books, strikes me as an intellectual,
as a "magic nerd" (analogous to, say, a math nerd) if you will. This
is quite different from Voldemort, whose purpose in learning the Dark
Arts is to rule people (and conquer death), or Bellatrix, whose
purpose in learning the Dark Arts is to cause pain.
Now, I know at this point some of you will say that Snape does cause
pain, that he bullies Neville and insults Hermione's teeth, but
regardless of how hurtful you see this behavior as being, Snape
certainly doesn't use Dark Magic to do it. Snape can insult people
quite well without using magic at all. So, that can't be his goal in
learning the Dark Arts.
As for the debate on Sorting, I would like to remind people that
canon repeatedly states that students are Sorted based on personality
traits (and in the case of Slytherin House, perhaps pureness of
blood.) I know that Harry tells his son that the Hat will take
preference into account, but I certainly don't see a student's
preference as the sole consideration. As some have said here, the Hat
wouldn't be needed at all if students could just state which House
they wanted to be in. And, even if the Hat gave Harry a real choice,
Harry had a piece of Voldemort in him, so his experience may not have
been typical.
I see Snape as being sorted into Slytherin because of his intense
ambition to learn, his relentless pursuit of knowledge, especially
forbidden knowledge. I imagine that he did, indeed, have a desire to
be a very powerful wizard, but that doesn't necessarily mean that he
hoped to use that power to hurt others. I don't see him as being
given the choice to go into Gryffindor; perhaps he asked the Hat to
be put in Gryffindor (because Lily had been put there), but the Hat
said no. (In fact, wouldn't trying to be in a certain House just to
be near someone you like be a sort of ambitious, cunning, Slytherin
thing to do?)
But once Snape was sorted into Slytherin, I expect that colored other
students' views of him (not to mention the readers' views.) If he had
been in Ravenclaw, I'd bet his interest in the Dark Arts would have
been interpreted very differently, as a desire to gain knowledge
rather than a desire to do evil. I see Snape's being Sorted into
Slytherin as a fateful event that determined much of his future. As
others here have said, being put into Slytherin is like being damned.
Which brings me to my next point.
Prep0strus (in post #175139) says that Lily's friendship with Snape:
> which extends even to defending him to members of her
> house, is not enough to keep him from practicing the dark arts, from
> falling in with a crowd that dislikes her based on her blood, and
> from pursuing evil.
I've already discussed the fact that we don't see Snape "practicing
the Dark Arts", so let's look at Snape's "falling in with a crowd
that dislikes" Lily for her ancestry. How could Snape NOT fall in
with that crowd? Who else is there for him to "fall in with"? His
whole house is like that! As many here have noted, we don't see any
good Slytherins for Snape to be friends with. As for being friends
with Gryffindors, we know that Snape is bullied by a bunch of them.
In the "Snape's Worst Memory" scene, it says that Snape was clearly
unpopular, so that presumably rules out most of the Hufflepuffs and
Ravenclaw as well. Snape didn't "fall in" with a group that dislikes
Muggleborns, that Sorting Hat put him there, and he couldn't make any
other friends at Hogwarts. (Lily wasn't a friend he made at Hogwarts;
she was a someone whose friendship he LOST while at Hogwarts.)
I know a lot of people were confused by the scene in "The Prince's
Tale" where Snape looks "stricken" when Dumbledore tells him that he
is brave and that maybe the school sorts too soon. I wasn't confused
by this at all. I read this as Dumbledore saying that Snape should
have been in Gryffindor. Snape looks "stricken" because he feels that
being put in Slytherin ruined his life. How telling is it that when
he wants to apologize to Lily, the door to Gryffindor house stands
between them? She turns her back on him as he "struggles on the verge
of speech," and closes the Gryffindor door in his face.
I also believe that this is the reason that Snape can't stand being
called a coward. To him, being denied entrance to Gryffindor House
is what removed Lily from his life, so he sees being called a coward
as being tantamount to being told that he is unworthy of Lily.
However, I don't necessarily think that Snape ever lacked bravery. I
just think that, with Snape's burning desire to learn about the Dark
Arts, the Hat thought he was more suited for Slytherin, even if he
also had traits that would have "qualified" him for Gryffindor and/or
Ravenclaw.
To digress a moment, this (mistaken, I'd say) belief that he wasn't
brave enough for Gryffindor may also be one of the reasons that Snape
gets so angry at Neville. I think it really pushes Snape's buttons to
think that Neville who initially seems so timid was
considered "brave enough" for Gryffindor, but Snape wasn't. Snape
may be thinking, "You're supposed to be so brave, let's see you stand
up to me!" Would that justify how Snape treats Neville? No. But it
may help *explain* it. (Neville's incompetence in class also
obviously drives Snape nuts.)
My belief is that if Snape was really as bad as many people here seem
to think he was, he would never have worked for Dumbledore,
particularly not after Lily was dead and he had no chance of getting
her in his life. I think the storyline of Dumbledore's friendship
with Grindelwald is intended to show that even good people can do bad
things when they are put in situations that encourage evil -- and it
certainly looks like Slytherin House, especially during the reign of
Voldemort, encourages evil.
When I got to the scene where the Sorting Hat is set on fire, I
thought, "Finally! No more dividing the Wizarding World! No more
intentionally setting children against each other!" Alas, that was
not how JKR meant it to be.
-- JudySerenity, permanent Snapefan, posting here for the first time
in years
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive