horcruxes

[montavilla47]

No: HPFGUIDX 179846

> --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "apetersonhanson" <apetersonhanson@> 
wrote:
> >
> > I may be newly joined to this group but I see no discussion about
> > Horcruxes which were a huge part of the book and series. Which was the
> > Horcrux people thought most important or meaningful?

Montavilla47:
I guess if I had to go for the most interesting Horcrux, it would be the 
diary.  It was also important, since it led Dumbledore to the multiple
Horcrux theory (which turned out to be true).

The story of the locket Horcrux was great, and I liked the image of 
the eyes in the locket.  That was nice and evil.

The rest were not very interesting, even if the ring had the resurrection 
stone in it.

Nagini made no sense to me.  Snakes die.  Why put your Horcrux in 
something that dies, if you have a choice?  Why not put it in your
wand, instead?  That might be kind of useful, given that wands can,
with care, last forever, and that a wand sort of has a life of its own,
anyway.