Killing and Morality/Sarah Monette(SPOILERS) and JKR WAS: Re: JKR's Opinion
horridporrid03
horridporrid03 at yahoo.com
Wed Dec 19 19:12:49 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 179969
> >>Betsy Hp:
> <snip>
> I don't admire Harry for his decision to not kill. I felt it was
> pasted on morality that only worked because the author was on his
> side. There was no honest examination of Harry's decision, IMO,
> because Harry was never put into a position where his deciding not
> to kill would lead to another's death.
> <snip>
> >>Alla:
> <snip>
> What does it mean his deciding not to kill would lead to another's
> death? I am talking about Harry deciding to spare people, whom he
> could not spare if he chose so. To me it is admirable.
> You mean that nobody was dead because Harry spared somebody or do
> you mean something different?
> Only in that situation you would respect Harry for not killing???
Betsy Hp:
I mean that Harry's choice was never made hard. He was never faced
with a situation where if he did not kill the war would be lost or a
loved one would be lost. It was pacifism on the cheap, IMO.
To pull in another example (and make this conversation even more
esotaric, sorry fellow list members) in 'The Charioteers', which took
place during the early stages of WWII when Britain was at her most
desperate, we had a pacifist character. His choice was *hard*. By
choosing not to kill, to be a conscientious objector, he was
literally faced with the possibility that Germany could well invade.
And the character wrestled with his decision. So while I didn't
fully agree with the character's choice in that I'd have probably
chosen differently, I admired the hell out of his convictions because
they were real convictions put under a massive test.
Harry's decision to not kill didn't ever threaten the effort against
Voldemort, so he never had to really wrestle with it.
Or to pull up another example:
****MAJOR MONETTE SPOILERS TO FOLLOW****
SERIOUSLY
REALLY
BIG
BIG
SPOILER
********
When Felix killed Malker he was in a fight for his life. If he'd
chosen not to kill, Malker would have killed him. And then Malker
would have killed Mildmay, and Felix knew it. So that choice not to
kill would have been at the expense of his own and his brother's
life. Harry was never placed in that position.
*********
AND WE'RE DONE (FOR NOW)
> >>Alla:
> <snip>
> And I am asking what exactly Trio got for themselves during
> horcruxes hunt and hallow hunt that benefited them first and
> foremost? Hermione would have much preferred to stay in Hogwarts
> and study, no?
Betsy Hp:
But as a Muggleborn she could not have. As Dean's example made
clear. So it's not like she was making a choice between school or a
life on the run. She was making a choice between a life on the run
or a life on the run with purpose.
> >>Alla:
> Ron would have at least preferred to be with his family, not in the
> forest.
> <snip>
Betsy Hp:
Ron, I think, made the biggest sacrifice because as a pure-blood I
think he could have gotten by in Voldemort's world. But it wasn't a
world he wanted, so working to defeat Voldemort really did benefit
Ron (and his family) in the end.
> >>Alla:
> I guess I want to know what did Trio get for themselves during book
> 7 What personal benefits?
Betsy Hp:
Harry got vengence and a peaceful world, Hermione got a magical world
she could actually take part in (she would not have had that had
Voldemort won), and Ron got a peaceful world and the chance to marry
the woman he loved.
> >>Sally:
> So because they would have suffered under a WW ruled by Voldemort,
> you consider their motives selfish?
> <snip>
Betsy Hp:
Hmm, yes to a certain extent (and I do realize it's an extreme
extent). But really, what I was most looking to was that their
actions were not completely *selfless*. Whereas the two characters
Alla and I have been chatting about, Felix and Mildmay, have both put
themselves at extreme risk (like a long drawn out death kind of risk)
to save people who's lives not only did not benefit theirs, but who
they also didn't really like that much.
To my mind that trumps their backgrounds as street children.
> >>Sally:
> I haven't read any of the Monette book so I can't compare the two,
> but Hermione isn't a kind or compassionate person? The girl who
> tried to free the house elves, save Buckbeak and whose first scene
> was helping poor hapless Neville find his toad. And "even Ron"?
> Does that mean that you consider Ron to be the kindest, most
> selfless or compassionate member of the trio? If so, I'd love to
> hear why, if you feel like discussing it, because I don't interpret
> Ron that way at all and I'm curious.
Betsy Hp:
Fair warning, I really dislike Hermione. Any girl who can, without
hesitation or remorse, disfigure another student scores high on my
creep-o-meter. Plus, I feel that she abuses Ron. Literally,
physically abuses him, which also gets a ping on the meter. Hermione
is compassionate when she feels like it. But she can turn it off at
a moment's notice if it's to her benefit. Hermione has no respect
for law. She *is* the law as far as she's concerned. What Hermione
wants, Hermione gets and that's all there is to it. (That's all my
opinion, of course. I know others feel quite differently.)
Ron, on the other hand, while he can be incredibly cruel with his
verbal barbs, actually does try and look at things from the other
person's point of view. So I do think he's the... I guess I'd say
most likable member of the Trio for me.
****BACK INTO MAJOR MONETTE SPOILER TERRITORY****
> >>Betsy Hp:
> <snip>
> They live in a harsher world, but despite that, they've shown more
> kindness, selflessness and compassion than I've seen out of Harry,
> certainly Hermione, and even Ron.
> >>Alla:
> They would not stop before taking a life, if they need it to help
> themselves. Sorry, not my idea of the better people. And if Mildmay
> really did not want to be a killer, I think he should have tried
> harder not to kill.
Betsy Hp:
Mildmay was literally dying because of his extreme poverty (sick with
fever and about to get evicted) *because* he'd chosen to no longer be
a killer. And you have to keep in mind, he was trained as a killer
from age thirteen up. He was alot like those child soliders you hear
about. His Keeper had a major, major hold on him. He talks about
being a stupid kid and doing anything he could to make her proud of
him. It was a huge step for him to runaway from her and strike out
on his own. And he did it *because* he didn't want to kill any more.
> >>Alla:
> He is oh so very upset, but he kills on the ship anyways, no?
> <snip>
Betsy Hp:
Um, no. That's where he refused a place in the life boat so that he
could stay and protect Felix. One of the sailors died in the storm
(he later found out) and he added that death to the toll of deaths
around him. But Mildmay had nothing to do with it. He was just
really depressed and feeling like he was a bad luck charm. (Anyone
around me will die, because I suck, so it's all my fault.)
> >>Alla:
> I am just again cannot put in my mind the idea that killer and
> emotional abuser of somebody who seemed to love them so much (IMO)
> are better people than Trio. They are great characters, sure, but
> better "people"? Not to me.
Betsy Hp:
Well, part of it is that I see the Trio as pretty icky for far less
reason. That Felix can trust anyone, feel any compassion towards
anyone, risk himself for anyone, or just out and out love anyone with
his background? It's amazing, to my mind. So I look at Hermione
(and you know my views on Hermione <g>) and think, "What's her
excuse?"
> >>Alla:
> But I think I am starting to parrot myself. I will try to restrain
> my fingers from next reply, since I think we are entering tennis
> match zone.
Betsy Hp:
Hee! We probably are (though I tried to make the conversation a bit
more interesting with the pacifism thing). But I adore Mildmay and
Felix (yes, even Felix!) so much I could talk about them forever.
<bg> Plus, I'm rereading, so it's all fresh in my mind. <even bigger
grin>
Betsy Hp (should probably look for a Monette group now that I think
on it...)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive