Harry Potter is not a Horcrux

Sunny entangledhere at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 3 21:59:26 UTC 2007


No: HPFGUIDX 164569

Jeremiah,
   
  Yes, I agree with you on most points.
   
  I'm just saying that it's possible that Harry WAS a Horcrux and that DUMBLEDORE removed it from him, and that's why he has a scar.  In the first chapter of PS, Minerva asks Dumbledore, "Is that where?" and he says, "Yes, he'll have that scar forever."  BUT if the AK curse doesn't leave a scar, why would she ask that question?  Wouldn't she ask, "Why is there a scar?"  So perhaps they extracted the piece of soul from Harry before bringing him to the Dursleys', which is what took 24 hours, and which would explain remnants of Voldemort being left in Harry.
   
  It's just a theory, like anything else, of course.  =)
   
  *Sunny*


We are the music makers. We are the dreamers of the dreams.
  http://www.sunnychristian.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





More information about the HPforGrownups archive