Dumbledore & Dursleys Once More With Feeling
va32h
va32h at comcast.net
Thu Feb 15 05:04:10 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 164999
>From time to time we've discussed why Dumbledore had to leave Harry
with the Dursleys - blood protection being the excuse for what is
otherwise an act of cruelty and so on.
I thought of that thread this evening as I was looking for some
material for an essay I am working on about the literary tradition of
close male friendships (working title: Guy Love: From the Epic of
Gilgamesh to NBC's Scrubs, the Importance of the Male Bond in
Literature.)
I was looking for The Chosen - because of the friendship between
Danny and Reuven. And I came across the part where Dannys' father
explains why he raised his son in silence.
Danny's father, Reb Saunders, fears his son's brilliant and
analytical mind will render him soulless. He chooses to raise him in
silence - he never speaks to the boy except during Talmud classes -
as a way to force Danny into intropection, and develop a sense of his
soul, and empathy for others. Reb Saunders wants Danny to "learn[s]
of the pain of others by suffering one's own pain
by turning inside
oneself. . . . It makes us aware of how frail and tiny we are and of
how much we must depend upon the Master of the Universe."
The hope was that Danny would follow his father's footsteps, and be a
Rabbi and a tzadik - a completely righteous individual - to his
congregation, but Danny wants to study psychology - and when Reb
Saunders realizes this, he can instead be a tzadik for the world.
I can't believe I never saw the similarities before - is that not
what Harry is - a completely righteous individual for the wizarding
world? And Duh! Harry is called the Chosen One. I feel like an idiot
for not seeing this sooner.
Anyway - this raising a child in silence business is *not* given a
free pass by anyone in the book. Danny suffers, Danny's friend Reuven
considers it cruel as does Reuven's father. Repeatedly the characters
are shown discussing whether the result of this method is worth its
costs. Reb Saunders even acknowledges that he has given up a certain
relationship with his son, in order to give him this compassion, this
silence.
It's certainly no endorsement of the practice...and yet by the end of
the book you see why Saunders did it - and Danny does as well, and he
is at peace with it and even appreciates it.
I still understand the irritation readers feel with Dumbledore - but
I'm so much more content in my own mind, now that I've made this
connection.
And even if you don't buy the connection - read The Chosen, if you
haven't. It's such a wonderful book!
va32h
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive