[HPforGrownups] Re: Harry's Characterization
sunnylove0 at aol.com
sunnylove0 at aol.com
Sat Jan 6 02:22:37 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 163482
In a message dated 1/5/2007 6:05:47 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
bboyminn at yahoo.com writes:
Again, if you place yourself in Harry's mind to do anything
else is completely irrational. Consequently, if Harry is
at least making an effort in the next book I will be
satisfied, but if he plans to get by on Luck or boxes of
chocolate or hugs and kisses, then all plausability has
gone out of the story. It's Harry and only Harry from here
on in, at least in Harry's mind. That means he has to
meet Voldemort as close to Voldemort's level as he can get.
That's from Harry's internal perspective. From the external
perspective of a reader, I agree, some unforseen abstract
force will help Harry win the day, but it is irrational
for Harry to count on such a force and not prepare himself
to the best of his ability.
A few unrelated points:
If Harry goes wand blazing alone against anyone (and I am worried about his
animus towards Snape, whether Snape is good, bad or indifferent) he is very
likely to get killed. But the entire point of having love on his side is that
he will not do anything alone. Harry knows several wizards who will lay
their lives for the sake of himself and his mission, especially Ron and
Hermione. In contrast to Voldemort, who has no truly loyal followers, only excepting
an insane, sadistic deluded girl who cannot be trusted.
Harry's job for most of book 7 will be to seek out and destroy Horcruxes.
He needs to stay out of the way until this mission is accomplished. I even
wonder, along with RedHen and several other theorists, whether Harry will be
the one to actually kill Voldemort. The prophecy after all, says "vanquish"
not kill.
And Dumbledore's preparation: did he train him in defensive spells and
charms? No. The greatest witches and wizards of the age, who likely used every
spell in the book (I'm sure Amelia Bones did not go down without a fight)
ultimately lost their battles, one by one. Instead, Dumbledore shows Harry
Voldemort's true weak spots, not spells or potions or curses (he knows them
all)...but the Horcruxes, his checkered past, his empty longing after things instead
of the love of others, his lack of any emotional bond with anyone.
I'm quite sure Harry is capable of driving a metaphorical sharp knife into
all of them, and to do it with the pity and understanding of which even
Dumbledore (bless his heart) was incapable.
Amber
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive