Horcrux confusion (was Harry as Horcrux/De-Horcruxing the Diary)
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at tiscali.co.uk
Sat Jan 20 23:58:38 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 163982
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Mike" <mcrudele78 at ...> wrote:
> Mike:
> I went back to reread your other post and the scar as portal would
> still fit with your theory. But what wouldn't fit is how the diary
> soul piece got out if Harry didn't stab the "location" of the diary's
> Horcrux. IOW, if Harry wasn't de-Horcruxed when he got stabbed by the
> Basilisk fang because it didn't stab his scar, how come the diary
> *was* de-Horcruxed if it wasn't stabbed in it's Horcrux location? I
> suppose you could say that Harry just got lucky, hit the right spot,
> but it weakens any theory to claim luck was with you. Then again, the
> diary was so small, maybe Harry couldn't help but hit the Horcrux's
> location.
Geoff:
I hope Mike will forgive me for using part of one of his posts but I am
being pedantic and pointing out that there is a good deal of confusion
over the use of the word Horcrux.
In the above, for example, the diary wasn't de-Horcruxed by being
stabbed in its Horcrux location. The diary IS the Horcrux. What was
removed was the soul piece. From the analogy which has been used of
a cake and the cake-tin, the cake-tin is the Horcrux and the cake is
the soul fragment. It becomes confusing and difficult to follow an
argument when these two are mixed up.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive