The Irma/Eileen Theory & Snape's Return/Teaching timeline
Jen Reese
stevejjen at earthlink.net
Sun Jan 28 04:29:07 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 164226
zgirnius;
> I find this to be suggested as well by Dummbledore's testimony in
> GoF. How could Snape spy 'at great personal risk' if he
> only 'returned' just in time to start teaching at Hogwarts? Who was
> he spying on? If on the other hand Snape 'returned' at some point
> before he started teaching, this comment could be in reference to
> his activities before he started teaching, spying from within the
> Death Eater camp, which makes more sense to me.
Jen: Good point. There needs to be a period he was already working
as a double-agent for it to be a 'great' risk, likely right around
the time the Potters went into hiding since they were the reason he
went to DD in the first place. I've always been curious how long
Sirius was SK and how long they were in hiding.
> zgirnius:
> This seems plausible to me. Minus Eileen, it is the story I've come
> up with for myself from the clues we have in Dumbledore's
> statements from HBP and GoF, Fudge statements in PoA, and Snape's
> statements in HBP (Spinner's End).
Jen: Eileen doesn't have to be included although I like the parallel
with Draco's situation and how Snape's own experience might have
influenced his decision to take the UV. For someone like me who
still finds the UV questionable, this would supply at least a partial
motivation for why Snape risked his own and Dumbledore's life to help
Draco rather than simply agreeing to help him and following through
with his promise. (I have mutiple working theories for the UV <g>).
zgirnius:
> Though, to make a correction, we have no indication Dumbledore
> knew 'officially' that Snape was a Death Eater. He might have
> suspected it after Voldemort's actions tipped him off to the fact
> that Voldemort knew the prophecy. Though even then, it could just
> indicate that Snape told the story to the wrong friends, friends
> canon suggests he had.
Jen: Rather than saying 'Voldemort and Dumbledore both knew Snape
was the DE who had turned the prophecy over to Voldemort' a better
way to phrase it would be 'both knew Snape was the eavesdropper'.
This would make Snape at least a concern in Dumbledore's mind for
working at Hogwarts, whether he was certain of Snape's DE status or
not. And by the time Voldemort's actions tipped DD off it wouldn't
have mattered if Snape delivered the prophecy himself or told
friends, he wouldn't have been given a job without his story of
remorse.
zgirnius:
> Of course, once Snape approached Dumbledore, I presume he would
> have made a clean breast of that, but Voldemort would (at this
> point) not know that Snape had confessed to Dumbledore.
Jen: Voldemort knew that Dumbledore knew that Snape was the
eavesdropper <g>. That seems like enough in my mind for Voldemort to
suspect Dumbledore would not jump at the chance to employ him.
I thought after HBP that Voldemort wanted Snape placed next to
Dumbledore for the day when Voldemort would move against DD, that the
actions in HBP were later than intended but always planned in some
form. Now when considering Snape was not much older than Harry,
Draco, et. al., and that he was the eavesdropper who overheard the
prophecy, he doesn't seem the most *likely* person to send to
Hogwarts for a job anymore.
>Carol, who finds the theory interesting but not helpful to the
>crucial Snape/Harry relationship or particularly compatible with
>Snape's motives as we've seen them depicted in the books.
Jen: Do you get tired of people responding to your signature lines? :)
They're always such a nice summary to launch a new discussion. The
Eileen Prince connection could be a separate issue from the
Snape/Harry relationship and explain some murky issues in its own
right. Besides explaining why Snape started teaching at Hogwarts--as
opposed to why he returned to Dumbledore--there's also the issue of
Hagrid seeming to know more about Snape than he lets on. He did go
to school with Eileen and also worked on the grounds during the time
she was there. He's a much more observant person re: human
relationships than McGongall and might have recognized Eileen in
disguise.
There are two other reasons looking outside the story:
1) JKR conceived a storyline for Eileen which placed her in Slytherin
house at the time of Riddle and could foreshadow a role for her
beyond being the reason Snape was in Slytherin and why he called
himself the HBP.
2) JKR formally introduced Snape's parents into a series rife with
male characters who make pivotal decisions based on their
relationships (or lack of) with parents: Riddle, Sirius, Crouch Jr.,
Draco, Percy & Regulus off the top of my head. Harry is on this list
even though I think his truly pivotal moment is yet to occur.
In addition to expanding Snape's backstory, this twist could
influence Harry, who would understand Snape's desire to save his mom
just as he understood Draco's.
Jen
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive