Harry Junior

Renee rvink7 at hotmail.com
Wed Jul 4 15:15:13 UTC 2007


No: HPFGUIDX 171251

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Cassy Ferris" <xellina at ...> wrote:
>
> Renee Wrote:
> 
> > I don't want to read about a young man
> > who is selfish enough to reproduce,
> > whilst knowing he may be dead by the
> > time the child is born.
> 
> Eggplant Wrote:
> 
> >As for being selfish, well, all I can say is that I'd
> >be very pleased if Harry's genes remain in the pool.
> 
> Cassy:
> 
> At first I agreed with Renee about it being a very selfish act on the
> Harry's part. But after thinking about poor Ginny, who would be left
along
> to bring up the child, should Harry die,  I decided that the baby
> might actually be a consolation for her, as it will have a "part of
> Harry" in it. So, maybe it will not be such a bad dead after all.
> Anyway, I don't think that we'll see any kids born, save in epilogue.
> 
> 
Renee:
>From Ginny's point of view, it would be a good thing, yes. But not for
the child, and this consideration should prevail. 

But as I said, it would be very inconsistent on Harry's part if he
suddenly decided to marry Ginny while he still considered himself a
danger to her.






More information about the HPforGrownups archive