[HPforGrownups] Why Harry Potter (or his scar) is NOT a Horcrux
dracojadon at yahoo.co.uk
dracojadon at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jul 11 20:14:58 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 171586
Bart:
> A) Voldemort is depicted as being VERY fearful of death. It is
> highly out of character that he would have even started making his
> move towards conquest until AFTER he got the horcruxes all in
> place. Therefore, it is equally unlikely that he was PLANNING to
> turn Harry into a horcrux.
Jadon:
Harry wasn't important. Harry was a little niggle to be sorted out
before the real work could begin.
I wonder if it actually matters how many horcruxes one plans to
create - are five always good, because they're more than anyone's
made before, or is the magic incomplete because a sixth was intended,
or is it incomplete only in Voldemort's mind?
Incidentally, does the soul work like cake? i.e. 1st horcrux - 50% of
soul, 2nd horcrux - 25% of soul, 3rd horcrux - 12.5% of soul, and so
on. I ask (knowing it's not likely with JKR) because if it doesn't,
what's to stop LV finding he's low on horcruxes and creating a couple
more, this time with very specific anti-Harry spells? (I assume the
soul - retaining links to all its scattered pieces - weakens as each
dies, until it is in some way worthless, without needing to be finite
in volume.)
Bart:
> B) This leaves the possibility that Harry was made a horcrux by
> accident. Now, just because Lily used ancient magic doesn't mean
> that she made up the spell on the spot. Seeing that they were
> hiding from Voldemort, it is logical that Lily had the protection
> for Harry prepared. And I can't imagine a protection that would
> RESULT IN HARRY BEING TURNED INTO A HORCRUX.
Jadon:
Why not? One ancient magic, two ancient magics - ooh, shiny light
effects! And look, nearly everyone's dead! That's why Hermione told
me to always read the label, isn't it, Mummy? I didn't know mediaeval
mould could change instructions like that!
Jadon
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive