Invisibilility Cloaks and the hallows
duffypoo
cldrolet at sympatico.ca
Wed Jul 25 15:00:26 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 172682
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Natalie" <snifsmak at ...> wrote:
>
> 2. Aren't the hallows supposed to be one of a kind? Yet Moody had 2
> invisibility cloaks too which he borrowed to Order members to stand
> guard at the Dept. of Mysteries....
>
> any theories?
>
> Cheers/Natalie
>
No answer to your first question, but I'm betting Moody's cloaks are
just normal ones, "a travelling cloak imbued with a Disillusionment
Charm, or carrying a Bedazzling Hex, or else woven from Demiguise
hair..." (DH CanEd pg 333) Harry has the true cloak, "a cloak that
really and truly renders the wearer completely invisible, and endures
eternally, giving constant and impenetrable concealment, no matter
what spells are cast at it." (DH CanEd pg 333)
IMO, Harry could be seen by Bagshot/Nagini because he was wearing the
Horcrux at the time and Nagini's Voldi-bit connected with the bit in
the Locket and the bit in Harry.
DuffyPoo
CathyD
- who never would have believe Harry was a Horcrux and agrees with
whoever here said it was a poor plot device.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive