Victory for TEWWW EWWW

[rowena_grunnionffitch]

No: HPFGUIDX 173079

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "adamjmarcantel"
<adamjmarcantel at ...> wrote:
>
> I agree 100% and am glad someone else shares this view.  I have
> always been a Snape-defender (not ALWAYS a fan) and always trusted he
> was on the good side...although characterizing him as a "hero" is a
> bit much.  He was good, but flawed, as are most of us...

  A hero can't be flawed? Contrarywise a flawed persona can't be heroic?
I don't think I agree.

  But then I think it's pretty obvious that by the battle of Hogwarts -
if not long before - it's no longer about Lily or protecting her son
but about defeating Voldemort forever. If it wasn't, if he was still
obsessed solely with Lily, then why did Snape tell Harry he must die?

rowena_grunnionffitch