The Prince interpreted

[Lisa]

No: HPFGUIDX 173086

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Dana" <ida3 at ...> wrote:
>
Of course if you for a second would take off your Snape orientated 
> glasses, you would actually be able to read the text without the need 
> for me to type out the entire thing out the same book you hold in 
> front of you.
> Snape's omission to confront Lily about any type of murder attempt on 
> either James or Sirius part means that it never was. Snape wasn't 
> tricked. 

Lisa:

I'm confused.  Since when does the information purportedly known by the 
victim exonerate the perpetrator's intent??  One has nothing to do with 
the other.  If Sirius simply wanted to confirm what Snape thought he 
knew, he'd've said, "Yeah, he's a werewolf, so what?  Dumbledore 
already knows, so tattling will do you no good, you git."  Instead, he 
sets him up to be killed or turned into a werewolf.  Intent is the key.