Unforgivables.

[Ann]

No: HPFGUIDX 173564

I have read all the replies and I am surprised, stunned, and a bit
insulted, however, I have not noted the strength and conviction of
this "Fiction" novel portraying a "Fictional" main character who has
previously exhibited consistent tendencies to bend or blatantly break
rules throughout this series of "Fiction" novels.

In real life, growing and learning is also achieved by periodically
bending and breaking a few rules, albeit murder and sooo many other
unforgivable actions an exception, in exception of defense even in a
state of war.  Unfortunately this seems to be the situation (a state
of war) in this "Fiction" novel. This glorious work of art addresses
the fine thin and often opaque lines between morally and legally
correct in `a state of war' under the transfiguring veils of fear and
survival. It is one personal judgement that affects many besides the
MoM is corrupt. Therefore wouldn't all laws recede to a moral good as
opposed to a legal good until the state of war diminishes.

I feel that fear is very personal and being such is as individualized
as people are. Meaning: my cause and level of fears is different than
yours and conversely.  Therefore, as I read and reread this, and a few other passages, as I read this "Fiction" novel, twice, I understood that Harry was in fear due to his prior experience with DE's and LV, (not merely this DE), that Harry's apparent chivalry was shocking to McGonagall, (the way I read it, DH Chapter 30), and Harry's intent was not internally intense as other DE's or LV using the UC's but merely a survival and protection in a state of war. I feel it was an external intensive reaction because of his response to using it (DH Chapter 30) and other specifics of this fictional story (his pursuit of Horcrux in the midst of monumental obstacles - other people with other priorities & time (before LV arrived to regain control of Horcrux) in this chapter.

I was surprised to read Harry used an UC, but it was not the only
thing I read in this "Fiction" novel that Harry did which surprised
me; more surprised at what I have read in this topic posts.  But I do
believe, and strongly, that anything read and discussed anywhere does
not consent reproach or discredit to anyone's families.

all this in my humble opinion,
ann