Book 7: The end of Voldemort
Goddlefrood
gav_fiji at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 6 00:57:44 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 169863
> Pickle Jimmy:
> Sounds like you're alluding to a "Dumbledore died to again
> seal some kind of old magic protection on Harry theory -
> similar to Lilly's"??
> Voldemort: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame
> on me!
> ... Sorry if I have put words in your mouth, not my intent ...
> Actually, this seems a little shallow for a person of your
> thinking Goddlefrood - it is more like something I'd come up
> with :-)
Goddlefrood:
As I say it's a work in progress, but the above pre-empts it
in no way at all.
To lose one theory would be unfortunate, to lose two looks
like carelessness.
The blood protection on Harry ends at 17 so I see no reason
why anyone else has to die to protect Harry for that purpose.
Others will undoubtedly die, but not to install any further
protections. I'd suggest Harry would be able to take advantage
of DD's knowledge of blood protection, but not to hide himself.
Voldemort's no fool, but he's not familiar with many of DD's
magic tricks, as DD himself told Tom when he applied for the
DADA job. LV underestimates certain brands of magic and the
love based ones will, in my divination, be one of them. That,
again, is on the list to write up, but I've no idea when it
will appear. Before DH anyway is all I'll commit to.
Goddlefrood lamenting DD almost as much as Fawkes did, but
feeling better for the song.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive