Tapestry!!!
Dana
ida3 at planet.nl
Thu Jun 7 20:56:49 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 169973
bboyminn:
<snip>
> I think in time, had things worked out better for
> Sirius and Harry, they both would have regretted
> trashing all those family artifacts. I think as
> things are, Harry will deeply regret not having
> them around because to him they don't represent
> the negative history of the family, they
> represent Sirius.
<snipped the rest of your post but want to mention it holds a
beautiful sentiment)
Dana:
Although I understand what you are saying but to some extent the
material part of the house is actually not part of Sirius and does
not represent him. These artifacts represent what the Black House
stood for and that is not Sirius, so to me these artifacts would not
be needed to build a new House of Black with different values then
the old one. Artifacts are memories of the past and although surely
some things might have been worth saving, Sirius's chosen past can
not be found in these artifacts.
I personally do not feel that Harry's lash out towards Mundungus had
anything to do with the artifacts but with the disrespect Mundungus
showed Sirius by robbing his house. More like vultures picking the
skin of the bones as soon as their prey has exhaled the last breath,
before the body has time to cool off so to speak.
Now the tapestry I agree will just be but for some time now I have
been thinking about the need to have Sirius's name blasted off it. It
seems that the tapestry is magical enchanted to write itself but when
a person is blasted off it stops recording that person's genealogical
present and future. Tonks for instance was not registered on it
because her mother was blasted of it. This makes me think it was not
just a plot device to show family relations but also to conceal
something.
When Harry returns to GP to search for the locket he will probably
come across the tapestry again but Sirius death date will not be on
it because the tapestry will not be recording anything concerning
Sirius.
Yes, I know people will say he is dead but I'm not convinced because
canon foreshadows that he will be back as much as it foreshadowed his
coming dead.
So to me the tapestry could also be a metaphor that the line of
Black's as it excited has indeed died because even if Sirius lives
and has kids, the tapestry will not register them because Sirius was
cut out of the tapestry magic that keeps track of the members within
the Black family.
So even the tapestry will not make Sirius's dead final like it did
with Regulus or Sirius's mother and father. The blasting off seems to
specifically be a plot device for this reason (besides introducing
some family relations) because no person's relations to the Black
family was specifically concealed by no longer being mentioned. Black
women marrying outside of the direct line are indeed Black descedents
but their children's children don't seem to be considered Blacks
anymore and therefore seemed to fall out side of the tapestry magic.
So even if Tonks had been on there then her children will no longer
be considered within the direct line of Blacks and *this* tapestry
would not keep a record of them.
So say I'm in denial LOL but I think Sirius will have his chance to
built his own line of Blacks and create his own new Black family
history, just like Harry will do for the Potters. Neither of them
will be making GP their permanent home because that part of the
Blacks is gone forever. Sirius will make amendments with his past and
he will probably get himself some mementos from what the Blacks once
stood for to keep reminding himself that he made the right choices.
JMHO
Dana
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive