Werewolves and RL equivalents (was:Re: Snape - a werewolf bigot?...)
Dana
ida3 at planet.nl
Fri Jun 15 05:26:00 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 170294
> wynnleaf
> How is it that the "sexual predator" parallel *can't* be used
> because they are "always on the prowl," whereas Lupin is only
> driven to kill others monthly, but you *can* parallel being a
> werewolf to real life diseases even though those who are afflicted
> are *never* "on the prowl?"
>
> Seems to me a bit arbitrary.
Dana:
A sexual predator feeds on the power (and not the sex) he has over
its victims and is not by definition a victim of a disease like Lupin
is. A sexual predator is created by circumstances and uncontrolled
fantasies and is not classified as being caused by a disease they
have no control over. There are mental diseases that can control the
human brain but sexual predators are mostly sociopaths and not victim
of a human mental disease. We call these people sick people but that
is because their behavior makes us sick and not because their
behavior is caused by an illness. Seeing their victims suffer is what
feeds the hunger for more as it makes them feel even more powerfull
and that indeed classifies Greyback but certainly not all werewolves.
A werewolf has no human thoughts, it is driven by its instincts of
the creature the disease transforms the human into. Lupin is not a
person that feeds on having power and neither is his werewolf part.
Virusses do not feed on people because they want power over that
person but it is the way they survive and multiply and thus are able
to exist. That seems like what a werewolf does, doesn't it. It
doesn't act like a human it acts like a virus.
As I said when Lupin transforms he is no longer human, he is no
longer Lupin but a sexual predator is always that person living
within his own fantasy.
JMHO
Dana
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive