Justice to Snape WAS: Re: Werewolves? There Wolves!
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 23 03:34:21 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 170630
> > Alla: As to whether Snape set to destroy the Potters. As canon
> > stands right now - I do not know that, although I won't be
> > surprised if we will learn that Snape did know that Lily got
> > pregnant before he delivered Prophecy, maybe same day or
something.
>
> Toonmili:
Ouch, I can't believe you said that.
Alla:
Ouch?
Toonmili:
There was no way he could have known. Lily and James trice defied
Voldemort. I doubt they went about advertising it that Lily was
expecting.
>
> How do you think they knew it was someone close to them who was
> spying. They only told a very few amount of people and somehow
Voldemort found out they had a child. Unless you think that Lily
wrote Snape and told him that she was having a baby. There is no way
he could know that was expecting unless they were in touch. And I
think we can assume that they weren't.
Alla:
Yep, I specifically said that as canon stands right now he did not
know. As canon states right now, he delivered **unnamed couple and
their baby** to Voldemort.
But do I exclude the possibility that he may have known? No way,
especially since I believe that Snape having an obsession about Lily
will be disclosed in some way, shape or form.
> >Alla: So, I do not **care** why Snape did that. All that I know
> > that he did, he as far as I am concerned in cold blood delivered
> > two people and their unborn babt to the monster. I absolutely
find
> > this despicable.
>
> Toonmili: I never said that he was a good person. It was not a good
> thing to do. But it is important why he did it. What if his back
was against the wall just as Draco's had been.
Alla:
No, not to me. This is the kind of action which to me is
unexcusable, back against the wall or not. What Draco did is pretty
much of the same variety to me <g>. But JKR and myself may differ on
Draco, LOL.
> Toonmili:
That is why I think it is important we understand why he
> joined the death eaters. We don't know if joined on his own
accord,
> if he was tricked, if he was forced, we just don't know.
Alla:
LOLOLOLOL. That would be what Magpie ( I think) once characterised
as JKR coming out in book 7 and telling us about Snape as character -
Sorry guys, I was just KIDDING. And if you dig DD!M Snape, why
would even this variety of Snape be forced? Isn't Snape working for
redemption sort of important part of his character? And if Snape was
forced, he does not need any redemption for his past, no?
Well, this is one of the prediction I feel rather confident to make -
Snape joined DE out of his own free will. Feel free to remind me of
that after book 7 :)
Toonmili:
> And the memories form Occlumency are his, unless you are
suggesting that Snape has someone else's memories in his head and
finds tham so personal that he wants to hide it from Harry.
Alla:
Where do I start? How about the man being Snape, not the boy for
example? Wouldn't that be the nice trick on JKR's behalf? There are
several other possibilities which go against Snape being abused in
his childhood and scene being another trick to elicit sympathy for
poor Snape.
Although that may be " just kidding" backwards, I guess.
>
> > Alla:
> >
> > If faced with hard cold canon sure I will, LOL, but only then.
And
> > as I cheerfully promised on list, I will write a long apology to
> > Severus Snape - the Saint of all Causes.
>
> Toonmili: Then you should start typing from now. :)
>
Alla:
Oh, no worries, I have the template already <g> Want to prepare
yours just in case? <g>
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive