Snape's the Rescuer - Really?/Justice to Snape
houyhnhnm102
celizwh at intergate.com
Mon Jun 25 20:35:34 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 170767
Alla:
> I see no significance in Snape putting Ron on
> stretchers first. IMO.
houyhnhnm:
The significance is that shows that Snape was
performing triage by attending to the most severely
injured first. It reinforces the image of Snape
behaving with the professionalism of a healer rather
than being in a personal mode.
Alla:
> Gagging though is a different story. What **can**
> go wrong if Sirius will be talking, binded?
houyhnhnm:
He wouldn't be talking, gagged or not, if he was
unconscious. From that I had concluded that the
gagging served no practical pupose whatsoever. It
was just Snape *over*compensating for having been
unconscious and out of control during an emergency.
It was his way of reassuring himself that he was back
in control. However, I like Montavilla's idea that
the gag may have been intended as protection against
any return of the Dementors.
Alla:
> And I am saying that I inprepret this **image** [...]
> as image of practical, hypocritical bastard, who is
> concerned how Dumbledore and authorities would see
> him when he comes back to the castle with **murderer**
> on stretchers.
houyhnhnm:
If it was only for show, Snape could have arranged
Sirius and the kids on stretchers when he got to the
door, after visiting whatever indignities on them he
wanted during the trek up to the castle. He didn't
do that. How you treat an unconscious person when no
one is watching: I just can't imagine any situation
in which character would be more transparently revealed
than that, in fiction or real life. And I speak as
someone who has both attended unconscious patients and
watched others attend them.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive