Hagrid the animal abuser (was:Hagrid and Draco WAS:Re: Dumbledore...
lyraofjordan
lyraofjordan at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 16 16:59:25 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 166167
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "justcarol67" <justcarol67 at ...>
wrote:
>
> Katie wrote:
>
> I think you're taking a hard line against Hagrid. I agree that he is
> often less than concientious about his "pets", but I don't think
he's
> an abusive, off-balanced animal hoarder.
>
[snip]
> > So, in the end, I think that Hagrid is definitely NOT an animal
> abuser, just a well-intentioned, but often thoughtless, man who
really
> likes wierd pets. <snip>
>
> Carol responds:
> I agree with you. Except for the Flobberworms, which, IIRC, die from
> being fed too much lettuce and the Skrewts, which kill each other
off,
> and the poor Bowtruckles burned in the fire (not Hagrid's fault), he
> takes pretty good care of his pets.
>
> It's the students who are in danger
[snip] >
> Snape doesn't need a textbook because he has all the potions in his
> head, but in Hagrid's case, a Ministry-approved textbook comparable
to
> the one Lupin uses for DADA (also focusing on magical creatures,
> albeit mildly Dark ones) would have been a real boon. It would at
> least provide a logical sequence of creatures that the students
would
> need to know about in real life and in their exams. It might even
> provide lesson plans if there's a teacher's edition (not likely, but
> possible). All Hagrid would then have to do is obtain the creatures
> for the lessons, explain their characteristics, and let the students
> actually care for them, which, after all, is what Care of Magical
> Creatures is supposed to be about.
>
> Carol, who thinks that McGonagall should hire Grubbly-Plank to teach
> COMC and demote Hagrid back to just plain gamekeeper and Keeper of
the
> Keys, whatever that means
>
Lyra:
I have to agree with both of you. Hagrid is not an animal abuser, the
kind of guy who keeps 25 cats in a single room. While he keeps Aragog
in a box when he's small, Hagrid has the advantage of the vast forest
where he can release his "pets" when they get big. I expect that
Norbert would have ended up there, as well, if Charlie hadn't found a
place for him in Romania, and probably the Skrewts too, had they
survived. (And I'm sure the Centaurs wouldn't have been happy about
either.)
Hagrid's failings result because he both underestimates the dangers
of the animals and overestimates the students' ability to handle
dangerous creatures (or the injuries that can result). Hagrid does
seem to have a gift of dealing with
animals, which the animals sense (from Aragog to the Centaurs, they
all have a certain respect for the way he treats them) -- a gift most
students don't have, and Hagrid doesn't seem aware that students lack
that ability.
As for textbooks, aside from the year of the disasterous "Monster
Book of Monsters," I think they use "Fantastic Beasts" (At least in
OOTP, Harry carries Firenze's message "it's not working" to Hagrid by
pretending to have left his copy of "FB" after class.) But again,
Hagrid simply ignores or understimates the MOM ratings of the animals
he chooses out of that book.
So, yeah, I agree Carol, let Grubbly-Plank teach COMC and let Hagrid
keep the grounds, and everyone would be happy in that little corner
of Hogwarts.
Lyra
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive