Trelawney's First Interview

[koinonia02]

No: HPFGUIDX 169491

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "karlii26" <karlii26 at ...> wrote:

> Like I said, I understand the inference, but I do not agree that it 
> is a fact.  There have been too many times, when we are led down 
> paths of inference.. to have it tossed back in our faces at the end 
> of the book.  That said, I think that it is ok, to keep a step back 
> from this, and not assume that we should take it at face value.


"K":

I do take it at face value. We are heading into the last book and
though I'm expecting surprises, I don't believe we are going to find
out Snape was not the eavesdropper. It serves no purpose. Why leave us
in suspense after OoP only to have Dumbledore lie to us in HBP?