Harry as godfather (Was: Sirius Black's role in DH -- why?)

dumbledore11214 dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 19 22:10:17 UTC 2007


No: HPFGUIDX 179208

> Dana:
<SNIP>
> Wizards do not live by muggle law so I really doubt that 
guardianship 
> would follow the laws as you know them in RL. 

Alla:

Yes, but we were just playing with it, I thought - how it may apply 
in RL loosely if it does.

 
Dana:
<SNIP>
 He says time 
> was of the essence but why? LV was gone and he knew that perfectly 
> well, so why could he not talk to someone that was formally one of 
> his own resistance group and Harry's suppossed guardian?<SNIP>

Alla:

Beats me, really.


Dana:
<SNIP>
> I do not blame DD, I blame his creator for the need of getting 
Sirius 
> out of the way and putting him on ice so he can enter the story at 
a 
> later date. Many of the things that surround this part of the story 
> have massive plotholes and improbabilities to begin with. <SNIP>

Alla:

Those things do not bother me much since I could never put a positive 
spin on them, and even when I did not know the extent of DD 
manipulativeness, I thought that DD was being a manipulative bastard 
here. Thus, all fits perfectly for me. If JKR wants me to think 
positive of them - then no can do, sorry.


 > Dana:
> Sirius knew enough to make his conclusions after he pleaded with 
> Hagrid multiple times to give Harry to him and Hagrid refusing, 
> stating he was under orders to deliver Harry to his aunt and uncle. 
> DD had no business of interfering with Harry whatsoever, the 
Potters 
> even rejected his offer to be their SK. DD can sit on his high 
horse 
> and make easy claims about what they should or shouldn't have done 
> but the Potters never asked him to intervene in Harry's life, they 
> asked Sirius to do so. <SNIP>

Alla:

Bravo, well said.

Dana:
> I do not buy the Sirius should have gone to DD idea to explain the 
> cause of events. Hagrid already had specifically told what was to 
> become of Harry and thus it would seriously have no effect at all 
on 
> the execution of DD's plan. Even if Sirius had explained it all to 
> DD, DD would still have been convinced that it would have been the 
> best thing for Harry to be under the protection of his mother's 
blood 
> and not in custody of Sirius Black. <SNIP> 

Alla:

Sure, agreed, but I still think he should have tried - not for DD, 
but for Harry and for himself, sort of exhausting all possibilities.

Like as I said, Sirius do not going to DD after Azkaban does not 
bother me a bit, I would NEVER go to DD, had he treated me that way.

I would be sure he would throw me back to jail without listening to 
me, after all he already did something like that.

BUT Sirius does not know that yet and I think he should have gone to 
DD, even though I agree he already seemed to make a decision.



Dana:
<SNIP>
 Sirius would not have been allowed to contact Harry 
> during the time he was with the Dursley's as we see no one else, 
not 
> accused of betraying the Potters, did either, not even DD himself. 
<SNIP>

Alla:

DD stopped Ron and Hermione from contacting Harry with important 
things after GoF - nothing to help the boy heal after trauma of 
graveyard. No idiots from the Order till he was fifteen contacted 
Dursleys.

JMO,

Alla








More information about the HPforGrownups archive