Harry as godfather (Was: Sirius Black's role in DH -- why?)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 19 22:10:17 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 179208
> Dana:
<SNIP>
> Wizards do not live by muggle law so I really doubt that
guardianship
> would follow the laws as you know them in RL.
Alla:
Yes, but we were just playing with it, I thought - how it may apply
in RL loosely if it does.
Dana:
<SNIP>
He says time
> was of the essence but why? LV was gone and he knew that perfectly
> well, so why could he not talk to someone that was formally one of
> his own resistance group and Harry's suppossed guardian?<SNIP>
Alla:
Beats me, really.
Dana:
<SNIP>
> I do not blame DD, I blame his creator for the need of getting
Sirius
> out of the way and putting him on ice so he can enter the story at
a
> later date. Many of the things that surround this part of the story
> have massive plotholes and improbabilities to begin with. <SNIP>
Alla:
Those things do not bother me much since I could never put a positive
spin on them, and even when I did not know the extent of DD
manipulativeness, I thought that DD was being a manipulative bastard
here. Thus, all fits perfectly for me. If JKR wants me to think
positive of them - then no can do, sorry.
> Dana:
> Sirius knew enough to make his conclusions after he pleaded with
> Hagrid multiple times to give Harry to him and Hagrid refusing,
> stating he was under orders to deliver Harry to his aunt and uncle.
> DD had no business of interfering with Harry whatsoever, the
Potters
> even rejected his offer to be their SK. DD can sit on his high
horse
> and make easy claims about what they should or shouldn't have done
> but the Potters never asked him to intervene in Harry's life, they
> asked Sirius to do so. <SNIP>
Alla:
Bravo, well said.
Dana:
> I do not buy the Sirius should have gone to DD idea to explain the
> cause of events. Hagrid already had specifically told what was to
> become of Harry and thus it would seriously have no effect at all
on
> the execution of DD's plan. Even if Sirius had explained it all to
> DD, DD would still have been convinced that it would have been the
> best thing for Harry to be under the protection of his mother's
blood
> and not in custody of Sirius Black. <SNIP>
Alla:
Sure, agreed, but I still think he should have tried - not for DD,
but for Harry and for himself, sort of exhausting all possibilities.
Like as I said, Sirius do not going to DD after Azkaban does not
bother me a bit, I would NEVER go to DD, had he treated me that way.
I would be sure he would throw me back to jail without listening to
me, after all he already did something like that.
BUT Sirius does not know that yet and I think he should have gone to
DD, even though I agree he already seemed to make a decision.
Dana:
<SNIP>
Sirius would not have been allowed to contact Harry
> during the time he was with the Dursley's as we see no one else,
not
> accused of betraying the Potters, did either, not even DD himself.
<SNIP>
Alla:
DD stopped Ron and Hermione from contacting Harry with important
things after GoF - nothing to help the boy heal after trauma of
graveyard. No idiots from the Order till he was fifteen contacted
Dursleys.
JMO,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive