Harry, impossible to kill?
allthecoolnamesgone
allthecoolnamesgone at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Oct 1 21:04:13 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 177628
> Harry: "He took my blood."
> DD: "He took your blood and rebuilt his living body with it! Your
> blood in his veins, Harry, Lily's protection inside both of you! He
> tethered you to live while he lives!" <snip> "His body keeps her
> sacrifice alive, and while that enchantment survives, so do you and
> so does Voldemort's one last hope for himself."
>
> This means that it is *impossible* for Harry to be killed by
> Voldemort after he is reborn. >
> > Allie
> (who gets more confused the more she thinks about these things, and
> is now so confused that she hopes some kind soul will help further
> muddy the waters... um, clarify things)
I'm not sure clarification is possible. I have, like you, thought and
thought about it and become more confused as I have thought. It's a bit
like watching the film 'The Illusionist'. Even after watching it a
number of times I still can't see how he did some of the things he did.
But he did them and the storu wouldn't have reached the end it did if
he didn't.
It would have been good if the Potterverse had enough internal
consistency for the 'blood tie' to be explicable, but it doesn't seem
to have. It was it seems a unique situation in Wizarding history,
didn't Dumbledore say that Voldemort and Harry had travelled into
realms of magic hitherto unexplored. So I am prepared to accept now
that it happened, the story needed it to happen so it did. It must be
umm Magic!
I am also prepared for someone else to tell me that I just haven't
understood it sufficiently.
To quote the Indigo Girls, who I happen to be listening to, or should
that be To whom I happen to be listening.
'There's more than one answer to these questions
pointing me in a crooked line,
The less I seek my source for some definitive,
the closer I am to fine'
allthecoolnamesgone
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive