Harry, impossible to kill?

[allies426]

No: HPFGUIDX 177671

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Steve" <bboyminn at ...> wrote:
>
> bboyminn:
> Rather than say Voldemort can or can not kill Harry, 
> let me say that I think it is possible for Voldemort
> to cause Harry's death, which is not quite the same
> thing.
> 
> It is not impossible to kill Harry, just far more
> difficult that other wizard who do not have this
> special protections surrounding them. I think the
> circumstance under which Harry's protection is
> highest, and Voldemort's is the lowest, if a direct
> frontal killing-curse attack by Voldemort. 

Allie:

And yet, that seems to be the only way Voldemort can come up with to 
attack him.  How creative.  :)

bboymin:

> Plus, Harry fell into an almost-death, or a near-death.
> So, the rebounding curse, would not have ripped Voldie
> from his body as completely as in Godrics Hollow. In
> a sense, Harry's near-death and the 'death' of the 
> Soul-Piece absorbed some of the impact. Instead of
> the full force of the AK rebounding back on Voldemort,
> it was more of a three-way split. 
> 

Allie again:

I do like this speculation.  (But it leads me to ask, why did Harry 
nearly die at all if he had Lily's blood protection?)

Allie
(who **thoroughly enjoyed** DH, and does not usually analyze or even 
notice the inconsistences)