Why did you decide to continue reading HP books?
Mike
mcrudele78 at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 13 00:21:47 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 177929
> > Alla:
> >
> > Anything in particular that hooked you on the books from the
> > start or just everything? :)
Mike:
I'm like zgirnius, if there had been only two books out when I
started them, I would have given up. The story was fun, I liked
Harry and Ron (Hermione was just okay) and I was interested in Snape
insofar as he seemed to have a connection to Harry's parents. It was
PoA that got me hooked.
Wonderful things kept popping up. The Dementors were scary, I wanted
to know who this Lupin character was, the Marauder's Map was the
coolest thing (and finding out Harry's dad and co. made it was a
bonus), Harry's Firebolt (cuz I loved Quidditch and loved that there
was so much of it in PoA), then the whole last part of PoA was
riveting. I loved getting the back story on the Marauders and Snape,
loved that JKR had Hermione helping Harry with the time turner, and
was overwhelmed by the connection Harry got to James through
his "Prongs" Patronus.
One of the biggest reasons PoA got me was that Harry finally won the
day with magic. If you think about it, Harry came out the hero in
both PS and CoS without really doing any magic. Now, PoA comes along
and Harry not only wins with magic he performs advanced, powerful
magic. Yeah, now we're getting somewhere!
> Laura
> <snip>
> The kids are dealing with divorce, death of a sibling, a
> horrific car accident, gangs, sex, etc. These books,
> in contrast, deal with serious issues, but they don't
> always take themselves so seriously. There is humor
> and relief to balance out the seriousness.
Mike:
This is a good point. There was not only a lot of humor, but the
serious themes weren't being shoved in our face. I'd much rather
JKR's subtle method than have to endure overwrought dialogue between
angst ridden teenagers.
> Laura
> Secondly, the books are complex enough to keep
> up continued interest.
Mike:
Another good point, Laura. I loved to think back and see how many
things were slyly or matter-of-factly brought up in one book, only to
resurface again and again in later books. The vanishing cabinets were
the most famous, especially how close Harry came to discovering their
secret. But we also got the Whomping Willow, the Shrieking Shack, the
RoR, Riddle's Diary, the Pensieve and "Expelliarmus". It made me want
to reread every book to see if I could guess what would make a re-
appearance.
> Laura
> Finally, there are the characters.
<snip>
> It is somewhat surprising, therefore,
> that I wasn't particularly taken by Snape.
Mike;
I loved to hate Snape, but like you, I wasn't really that much
interested in him. I didn't care what happened to him like I cared
what happened to Harry. I was interested in his story inasmuch as it
involved MWPP and Lily, but not for Snape's sake. I admit that I was
sorry to find his love for Lily was his sole motivation, I expected
something more. But it didn't bother me that much and I noted that
others enlightened me to LOLLIPOPS going all the way back to PoA.
> Laura
> but Harry, Ron, and Hermione certainly did. And, not just them,
> but loads of the other characters, too.
Mike:
Oh Yes!! 4 for 4 Laura!! The other characters made the story. I was
invested in Harry, but it was the other characters that made the
story fun to follow. Let's face it, Harry was just too bland. But the
Marauders (especially Sirius), the Twins, Luna, Neville, and even
Snape and Draco were much more colorful. They were where my fun came
from. And Ron was downright funny.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive