Likeable Regulus.
Zara
zgirnius at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 19 05:12:22 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 178085
> lizzyben:
> One reason that the whole Slyths=bigots thing annoys is because it
> seems to overlook the crucial role that family & environment play in
> forming people's ideology. Most children become members of the same
> religion as their parents; most join the same political party as
their
> family, because that is what they have been taught to believe. So
> taking a child like Regulus, and steeping him in pure-blood ideology
> at home, then shipping him to spend his formative years at a hotbed
of
> pureblood bigotry, the wonder would be if he *wasn't* bigoted at the
> end of that. Teenage boys especially tend to join gangs in order to
> gain a sense of identity. The Mauraders had their gang; the gang
> available for Slytherins was the Death Eaters. Becoming a Death
Eater
> made his family proud, & made him a part of what his friends were
> doing - just as joining the Order did the same for James Potter. And
> yet it seems, at the end, Regulus thought for himself & followed his
> heart rather than his family's teachings.
zgirnius:
I just have to recap your final sentence, "And yet it seems, at the
end, Regulus thought for himself & followed his heart rather than his
family's teachings." because I so agree with it. However, in my
opinion, Rowling in no way overlooks the importance of family and
environment in shaping people's ideology. On the contrary, she
provides us with numerous examples of this in action. Without any
detail, the assorted Death Eaters/sympathizers who represent separate
generations of the same family (Malfoy, Crabbe, Goyle, Mulciber,
Rosier). Regulus, as you ably demonstrate above (and the little canon
we have about him stresses the influence of his family and his pride
in his House). Snape, who we learn is the product of an unhappy mixed
marriage with a Muggle father who "doesn't like anything, much" and a
witch mother who 'cowers' when he shouts, and whose relationship with
his Muggle-born best friend becomes strained when he associates with
the people he lives among in the "hotbed of pureblood bigotry".
Draco, as well. We actually meet *his* parents and see quite clearly
where he learned his ideas. The hopeful message is that, in the end,
even people with all those disadvantages can choose to follow their
hearts, and when they do, good things happen. As Snape did when he
resolved he would do "Anything" (namely, betray the Dark Lord and his
fellow DEs as a spy) to keep Lily safe, or when Draco, given the
choice, realized he did not want to kill Dumbledore. And, of course,
as when Regulus made his amazingly courageous sacrifice to destroy a
Horcrux.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive