Canon citation requested (was Re: The problems with DD being gay)
sistermagpie
sistermagpie at earthlink.net
Thu Oct 25 22:27:51 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 178498
> Alla:
>
> I am sure I have already said it, but I want to hear your thoughts
on
> it, so I will say it again.
>
> To me Dumbledore being gay illuminates several things in the story,
> which was repeated as well, so I will not say it, BUT I also see
> perfect story line logical reason of why she did not disclose his
> sexuality at all.
>
> That is because **NONE** of the teachers' orientation is disclosed.
> Why should Dumbledore get special treatment indeed?
>
> I have no clue if Minerva, Sprout, Filius, Sinistra, Slugghorn
> straight or gay. No idea. I see it as teachers in old fashioned
> english school do not share stories of their love life with
students.
Magpie:
But you do know about Tonks/Lupin and Hagrid/Maxime. It's not all
teachers we don't know about--or perhaps it's better to say it's just
obviously that it's not a rule that we *can't* know about them. When
Hagrid was courting Maxime, when Lupin (first introduced as a teacher
and also in the Order, like both Dumbledore and Hagrid) gets involved
with Tonks we eventually hear about it and nobody thinks it's odd.
Alla:
>
> Why would they?
>
> I mean, Lupin's orientation is disclosed, but I think it is very
> telling that it is disclosed ONLY when he no longer teaches, no?
>
> Same thing with Snape, heeee. We only know about his love life,
sort
> of, when he is dead and no longer a teacher.
Magpie:
But so is Dumbledore dead and no longer a teacher. (Technically he's
never been a teacher, just a headmaster.) And Hagrid was a teacher
when JKR showed him with Madam Maxime--and she was a headmistress.
It's not expected that if we know a teacher we'll see them in any
sort of romantic situation, but it's not unheard of. So Dumbledore's
once being a teacher isn't any reason he can't have any romantic
relationships associated with him.
Alla:
As I also mentioned before the fact that no **KIDS** same sex couple
> ever mentioned that makes significantly less sense to me, but with
> teachers I understand it perfectly.
Magpie:
Yes, with students I think it makes more sense just for background.
With teachers we only know about relationships that she includes for
some specific reason. This includes Lupin/Tonks and Hagrid/Maxime.
Dumbledore's past relationship seems to be no less relevent than
theirs. It adds something to actions of his that are mentioned in the
books and also sets up more of a neat contrast with Snape. I think
it's a shame we miss that last bit.
-m
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive