Requirement for wands Was Re: Do we really get our closer?
zanooda2
zanooda2 at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 17 19:23:32 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 177135
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Cathy Drolet" <cldrolet at ...>
wrote:
> I have no doubt whatsoever, that McGonagall has her wand in the
> pocket of her robes when she transforms in PS. She would be a
> foolish witch to travel without it.
I agree with you that McGonagall had her wand in PS, but to me it
doesn't mean that she *needed* it for her transformation. There is
nothing in the books to indicate that a wand is required to
transform. On the contrary, Sirius transforms without a wand, and so
does Wormtail.
I know someone upthread wrote that Wormtail needed his wand to
transform, and even that he had it on him in the Shrieking Shack, but
I really can't see any evidence of that, however I try :-). If he had
his wand, why would he need to take Lupin's? And he used Lupin's wand
to curse Ron and Crookshanks, not to transform. He transformed
*after* Harry disarmed him.
We were told in DH that a wand is required to Apparate, but why
should it mean that it is also required for Animagus transformation?
For me, one not necessarily leads to another :-).
zanooda
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive