The Sword of Gryffindor
Miles
miles at martinbraeutigam.de
Tue Apr 22 19:19:10 UTC 2008
No: HPFGUIDX 182612
> tubazrcool wrote:
>
> Question (might have already been answered): If Basilisk venom
> destroys Horcruxes, correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the Horcrux
> inside Harry have been destroyed when the Basilisk fang penetrated
> his arm?
Miles:
I think the answer is quite simple. The point in destructing Horcruxes is
not to destroy the piece of soul within, but the object that keeps it from
leaving earth. Those objects have a powerful magic protection that can only
be overridden by certain magical powers, for example Basilisk venom.
Harry is not a Horcrux in this sense, he functions as an Horcrux by
accident. He could be killed by any means, magical or non-magical, that
could kill any wizard. Basilisk venom is lethal for him, yes, but not
because he contains a piece of Voldemort's soul. So, Dumbledore really
wanted him to survive - but not because he contained a soul piece besides
his own whole soul (something Dumbledore didn't know at that point), but
because he wanted him to live.
Miles
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive