CHAPDISC: DH35, KING'S CROSS

[kamion53]

No: HPFGUIDX 185136

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "montavilla47" 
<montavilla47 at ...> wrote:
>
(snapperdisnip)
> And, as a back-up plan, it would have been pretty good, since, if
> Harry failed  to destroy all the Horcruxes before getting killed 
(and
> if he wasn't resurrected), Snape would be armed with the best wand
> in the world, 
(snapperdisnip)
> 
> Montavilla47
> 
> Thanks again for the questions!


Kamion writing:

when reading about Snape being to be rewarded with the Elderwand I 
realised this could possible hide an answer to a problem I had since 
Snape killed Dumbledore in Half Blood Prince.

I was still convinced Snape was one of the good guys, but could not 
figure out that kind of change he would have in the Post-Voldemortic 
Period. He would never earn recognisition for all the work he had 
done, but always be branded as the Murderer of Dumbledore.

Unless Dumbledore had intended the mastership of the Elder Wand as 
the way for Snape to become redeemed. It could be very well possible, 
that Dumbledore had no hope at all that Harry would survive the 
destruction of the last Horcrux - the one in his own head. Voldemort 
would be mortal again, but Dumbledore has emphasised several times 
that there is NO real return from the death. Once death = death for 
altimes.
No one would expect Snape, who despiced Harry, to revenge Harry 
Potter, but he would be at the moment of Voldemorts's Glory in the 
perfect position to do so, having the strongest wand in his 
possesion, standing in his trust at the right hand of the Dark Lord.

Harry would be the martyr, Snape would be the liberator.
Martyrs get glorious funerals, liberators the glorious rewards.

Is this construction too ruthless? 
Or too farfetched.