Love Sacrifice / How Alchemy Didn't Work
Goddlefrood
gav_fiji at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 14 03:07:32 UTC 2008
No: HPFGUIDX 181538
> > Pippin:
> > Although love did not lead to Lord Voldemort's demise, it
> > did lead to Harry's survival and the survival of a great
> > many other people.
<SNIP>
> > IMO, it would not be much of a message of love and forgiveness
> > if love led to anyone's demise, even Voldemort's.
> <SNIP>
Goddlefrood:
That's right, it wouldn't, hence alchemy doesn't work. Glad we
agree there.
I have a somewhat different view on Lily's sacrifice. Yes, she
did sacrifice herself for Harry; however, without Snape's request
to spare Lily's life that sacrifice would have been meaningless.
The agreement LV gave to SS not to kill Lily came back to bite
him, IOW. So, although perhaps nauseous, Snape's love saved Harry
as much as did Lily's IMHO.
> Bex:
> Granted, luck played a pretty good role too. Without some good
> luck, Harry would have been toast years ago.
Goddlefrood:
Dare I say, a large slice of it?
> Bex:
> I think she may have borrowed some general imagery from the
> science of alchemy, but I don't think she was *trying* to
> imitate the three stages of alchemy.
Goddlefrood:
Nor did I, which partially led to the original post.
> Bex:
> I like Hagrid.
Goddlefrood:
The real reason - I had to convince myself that Hagrid wouldn't
die pre-DH, and it worked.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive