Why Harry did not kill Bella WAS: Re: horcruxes

[danielle]

No: HPFGUIDX 180191

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214" 
<dumbledore11214 at ...> wrote:
>
> CJ:
> > Harry performed two of the three Unforgivables -- crucio'ing 
Carrow 
> in the
> > Gryffindor Commons, and tossing Imperios around Gringott's like 
> Christmas
> > candy -- and attempted the third against Snape at the end of book 
> six. Harry
> > was far from pure. 
> 
> Alla:
> 
> Sure, but he did not kill anyone and consciously tried not to - in 
my 
> book that counts for something.
> 
> CJ:
> Not even particularly admirable.
> 
> Alla:
> 
> That's your opinion. I do not need him to be pure to be admirable. 
In 
> my 
> opinion he tried to do right thing enough times to admire him for 
> that. He failed a lot too of course.
> 
> JMO.
> 
> Alla.
>



Danielle here:

I am thinking more along the lines that Molly knew what Bella did to 
Nevilles parents, and if Bella did kill Fred  and wasn't she also 
trying to kill Ginny and Hermione when Molly stepped up. I think 
Molly feels she is the great protector of children in a way. She 
totally takes Harry under her wing, and probably would have taken 
Neville in as well if Ron had brought Neville home.