That "Love" thing
horridporrid03
horridporrid03 at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 5 22:53:51 UTC 2008
No: HPFGUIDX 180380
Betsy Hp:
So I was reading through JKR's interview with Pottercast (and eating
my popcorn *g*) when I hit on something that I think explains why the
series failed so miserably for me. I think I've said before that I
felt like DH had no "there" there. That it was missing a moral core
or foundation and so the rest of the series collapsed like a
particularly flimsy house of cards. (Again, all of this being my
opinion.)
I think this is what I was talking about:
http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/2008/1/2/pottercast-131-j-k-rowling-
interview-transcript
************
SU: Can you tell us what was in the Love room?
JKR: ...I think what's in the Love room, it's the place where they
study what love means. So that room, I believe, would have at its
center a kind of fountain or well containing a love potion, a very
powerful love potion.
[...]
So you would see wizards and witches taking it, they would study the
effects. The room of course has to be locked. And, you know, again,
there's this thread running through the books, what love does, and it
raises people to the heights of absolute heroism, (SU: It does.) as
in Lily, Harry, Neville, and it also leads them into acts of
foolishness and even evil, which is Bellatrix and also Dumbledore. He
became foolish, he lost his center, his moral center, when he became
infatuated. So that's what it does, that's what makes it dangerous.
***********
Betsy Hp:
To my mind, this is the most messed up definition of love, and the
most messed up way to study love I've ever heard of. Create a false
illusion of obsession and lust and *that's* supposed to teach you
about love? THAT'S what's in the "love room"?!?
And this is what the "good side" is apparently built on: this idea of
love as something possesive and weakening and dangerous. To equate
the lust of Bellatrix and Dumbledore with love... To my mind it
speaks to a basic misunderstanding of what love really is. It
explains why Snape was made pathetic and weak by his "love" for
Lily. It explains why we never see the Weasleys interact as a loving
family would, supporting and building each other up rather than
constantly sniping and pulling each other down. Heck, I think it
explains some of the weird vocabulary used to try and capture Lily's
love for Harry when her ghost appears to encourage Harry to die. It
certainly explains the "chest monster" as the analogy of choice for
Harry's big romance.
I'm not going to suggest that this is JKR's personal view of things,
but I think this is what she's comfortable with writing. And I think
it goes a long way towards explaining why her "epitome of goodness"
is such a cold-hearted bastard. Love is a weakness and a danger,
apparently. Of course her good guy avoids it if he can.
Betsy Hp
PS: I have to mention this gem...
"JKR: No! God, it wasn't Pansy Parkinson! I loath that girl. (JN and
SU laugh) I don't love Draco but I really dislike her. She's every
girl who ever teased me at school, she's the anti-Hermione. I loathe
her. Yes, sorry, sidetracked there by my latent bitterness
"
Hee! No wonder I liked Pansy. :D
Betsy Hp
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive