Lupin's behavior (Was: CHAPDISC: DH11, The Bribe)
sistermagpie
sistermagpie at earthlink.net
Tue Jan 15 17:37:50 UTC 2008
No: HPFGUIDX 180686
> zgirnius:
> It is not his presence that is the danger, it is his *existence*.
> Bella might or might not leave Tonks alone once she is no longer
> pregnant, but little Teddy, once he is born, is someone who needs
to
> be 'pruned' from her family tree regardless. His family is already
> associated with him.
Magpie:
I don't think it's so unreasonable for him to think that if he's
left the family they'd have an easier time of it. It isn't all about
Bellatrix hunting down Tonks and Remus is trying to take away
Bellatrix's power to hurt Tonks and the child by what he's doing.
Lupin knows he's already caused Tonks and the child this danger by
marrying etc. I would imagine that's part of what gives him his
desire to go out and fight that danger.
Whether or not his leaving is going to immediately lessen the danger
for Tonks and his baby I can see why he thinks that he can start to
do something better *now* by separating himself from them and
working to bring down Voldemort. His emotions don't only come down
to trying to get out of responsibilty, and I don't really think it's
a given that in a time like this obviously his most important
responsibility is to sit at home in close physical proximity to his
wife and child. Ultimately the book doesn't either since it seems
happy to honor him as one of the fallen dead at the school--and show
him wonderfully happy in the afterlife with Sirius Black and James
(he's slipped Tonks' leash again!).
> > Magpie:
> > Far from being something that disgusts Harry, it's something
Harry
> > himself would do. He thought himself perfectly self-righteous
when
> he
> > considered leaving Grimmauld Place when he thought he was
possessed
> in
> > OotP and he made similar speeches in this book about not wanting
to
> > put other people in danger because they're with him.
>
> zgirnius:
> He was not married to anyone at 12 GP, nor had he fathered a child
> with anyone there.
Magpie:
But so what? Being married to someone or being someone's father
doesn't change the basic idea of not wanting to put them in danger.
If anything it would give you even more of a horror of putting them
in harm's way. Lupin's situation is different (Harry's also worried
about the damage Ginny does to his ability to fight) but I don't
think the fact that he's married suddenly makes it irresponsible to
consider leaving to make his family safer or to consider leaving to
join the fight. That can be the right decision in some cases.
zgirnius:
>
> Harry's most notable noble leaving of someone because of the
danger
> it would put her in, is his breakup with Ginny at the end of HBP.
> Which, while it had not occured to me before, was quite possibly a
> contributing factor to Harry's anger, though secondary to the
issue
> of abandoning a child, which is a sore point with Harry. He also
> tries this speech on Ron and Hermione, who turn him down. Of
course,
> in all three of those cases, he tells the people in question what
is
> going on. My own impression of Lupin from that scene is that he
makes
> his decision without consulting Tonks, which is the source of my
> problems.
Magpie:
And that's a perfectly fine source of problems--but it's not got
anything to do with Lupin being a coward for preferring to act as a
part of the Resistance movement rather than stay at home with his
wife and wait for Harry, Ron and Hermione to do something. Not
discussing it with Tonks, if he didn't discuss it with her (and we
don't know that he didn't), is a different issue. Harry
didn't "discuss" his decision with Ginny either, he just told her
they were done and Ginny told him that's why she likes him so much.
(Ginny's usually being in the emotional state or of the opinions
Harry needs at any given moment is a great part of her attraction
for him.) If Harry had been married to Ginny at the time, and had
fathered a child with her already, she probably would have said the
same thing: "That's why I love you Harry, because I know fighting
Voldemort comes first. Me and the baby will be waiting when you come
home!" Ginny's always been a hero groupie, after all.
But Harry's logic in protecting Ginny has the same holes as the ones
you see for Lupin above. He's already involved with her. Voldemort
would already know he could use Ginny against him, even if he never
does. But Harry still says he's "too dangerous" to have a
girlfriend, and Ginny respects that. Everything about her character
indicates to me that if she were married to him she'd see it as
perfectly right that her man left them to hunt Horcruxes--because
that's the way he is and that's his way of protecting them--while
she stayed home with the baby. Women and children have been waving
their men off to war for thousands of years.
zgirnius:
> This (noncanonical) Lupin seems to me the guy you are defending.
> Heck, I admire that guy too. He just was not in evidence in "The
> Bribe".
Magpie:
Canon doesn't tell us what went down between Lupin and Tonks in "The
Bribe." Canonically Tonks seems to have different priorities than
Ginny and might never have agreed Lupin should go. And one can
imagine Lupin avoiding the confrontation and just leaving her a note
for all we know. Or maybe he just, like Harry, announced he was
doing it and went off, either with Tonks angry or weepy or with
Tonks bravely supporting him like Ginny. Or perhaps they did discuss
it. I don't remember if Harry asked anything about this.
But none of this has anything to do with Lupin being a daredevil or
trying to avoid his responsibilities or his offer to Harry being
unreasonable or bad. It's only a problem in the way Lupin
communicates or fails to communicate with his wife, which isn't what
Harry yells about.
Pippin:
IIRC, the point of Harry's conversation with Phineas was to show us
that Harry was rationalizing: he told himself that he was worried
about the danger to his friends, but he was more worried about being
different from them in a horrible and unique way. Now Harry
perceives that Lupin is doing the same thing.
Magpie:
Harry *wasn't* different from them in a horrible and unique way, and
he wasn't a danger to them, so the problem was taken care of for
him. If he really had been Voldemort's weapon and Voldemort had been
able to act through him things might have been different. Given the
current climate Lupin's fears aren't totally irrational. So Harry
shouldn't just assume his own projected issues tell the whole story.
Lupin would hardly just now be dealing with being horrible in a
unique way and different from other people--he probably can't ever
remember feeling any differently at this point in his life.
It's not that I'm arguing that Lupin was obviously absolutely right
that he should leave Tonks, or that he was only being self-
sacrificing and heroic here and couldn't be led by any of his own
issues. I can totally get behind Lupin needing to be honest with
himself and figure out when he's really taking rational precautions
and where he's hiding behind old defense mechanismss.
But I don't see why he'd be able to do that when all of his concerns-
-including the practical ones--are dismissed by everyone. If Lupin
is truly acting out of his own issues, those issues never come to
the surface. It's this sort of thing that adds up to my general
feeling that a big part of this guy is terrified of how kind of
satisfying it is to imagine turning into a wolf and killing these
people.:-)
Pippin:
Just as Harry forgot about Diary!Ginny, Lupin has forgotten that
Harry knows something about being treated as an outcast by his own
family and being viewed as a dangerous freak with criminal
propensities and powers he could not control.
Magpie:
I don't think Lupin "forgot" this but that he naturally doesn't
equate Harry's situation with his own because it's not the same.
Other characters are quick to say they know what Lupin's situation
is like and he should just do like they want him to do, when I just
don't think they're really putting any effort into understanding his
pov.
Pippin:
Lupin is not proposing to protect Harry in addition to protecting
his child, or in order to protect his child from Voldemort. He's
proposing that the child won't suffer by his absence, which is
absurd.
Magpie:
Ironic that JKR then decides to randomly kill off both Lupin and
Tonks--having Tonks run off even more heedless of her child having
no parents--and then that child is part of the happy epilogue having
had a life that shows nothing like Harry's suffering by the absence
of his parents.
Not that I think this means Teddy didn't miss anything by not having
parents--of course he did. But he had a very different life than
Harry did and in the end it looked like fighting Voldemort was
considered an okay reason to put yourself in danger while your child
is left behind with somebody else. As long as you did it on the
author's terms. She wanted her war orphan.
-m
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive