House elves and some spoilers for Swordspoint WAS: realistic solutions
a_svirn
a_svirn at yahoo.com
Fri Jan 25 23:02:53 UTC 2008
No: HPFGUIDX 180982
> Carol:
>
> The only kind of "will" that House-Elves seem to have is to serve a
> master that they think is deserving, which is why Dobby and Kreacher
> rebel in their respective ways. Dobby wants to be a "Free Elf"--free
> to serve Harry Potter
a_svirn:
If it were true, why didn't he offer his services to Harry? He spent
an entire year applying for various jobs and never once approached
Harry. Besides, he wanted to be employed, not to be owned by a
congenial master.
> Carol:
(and/or work for dumbledore to earn just enough
> money to buy socks. He doesn't want too much time off because he
> "likes work better").
a_svirn:
So what if he is? Is it a justification for putting him under magical
and legal constraints?
> Carol:
Kreacher, too, likes to work and does it
> voluntarily once he and his new master come to a mutual
understanding.
a_svirn:
I still don't get how liking to work and even wanting to serve
translates into wanting to be someone's property. Much less anyone's
property.
> Carol:
> Winky hates her "freedom," and uses it to become a miserable
drunkard
> because she wants to return to her beloved master.
a_svirn:
Winky hates herself. She failed her beloved master and the whole
family was endangered because of it. And came to an ignominious end.
> Carol:
> Where do we see a single House-Elf who wants what human beings call
> freedom?
a_svirn:
And what do humans normally call freedom? Exemption from slavery?
Dobby certainly wanted that. Liberation from an arbitrary and
autocratic control? Both Dobby and Kreacher wanted that. Liberty of
action? Again Dobby and Kreacher wanted that. Freedom of choice? Here
we go again: Dobby and Kreacher wanted that. Winky did not wanted all
those things perhaps. But then she though herself a privileged
servant entrusted as she was with an important mission and dangerous
secrets. She cherished her privilege and grieved when she lost it.
But, then, you know, the same is true for real live slavery. Those
slaves who have privileged positions hold onto them. What else?
Wages? Well, Dobby wanted them too, not that it has anything to do
with slavery per se.
> Carol:
Do they want to vote?
a_svirn:
Goodness, you almost sound like Hermione. And how do you know that
they don't want to vote? Then again, do I wonder, wizards want to
vote? It doesn't look like they have general elections.
> Carol:
> All a House-Elf wants (and that includes the so-called Free Elf,
> Dobby) is a Wizard master or mistress that he can respect and who
> treats him well. *Why not listen to the House-Elves* and believe
what
> they say (or what their actions show)?
a_svirn:
Yes, why not. Kreacher cried "I won't! I won't", and as Dumbledore
said, pointing out the obvious, he objected very much to pass into
Harry's ownership. As for Dobby, he wanted an employer, not master.
He was careful to make this distinction. Moreover even if he had
wanted a kind master it would not have made him a slave. I can wait
on you, cook for you and clean for you, and even grovel before you,
but all this would not make me your slave as long as I am free to
disobey and to walk away from you whenever I choose.
a_svirn
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive