CHAPDISC: DH24, The Wandmaker
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 8 03:21:01 UTC 2008
No: HPFGUIDX 183617
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "cubfanbudwoman"
<susiequsie23 at ...> wrote:
<SNIP of the summary>
>>
> QUESTIONS
>
> 1. "It was like sinking into an old nightmare; for an instant he
> knelt again beside Dumbledore's body..." [p. 386]. Is there any
> character in this series who has as much experience with old
> nightmares? If you think there is another (or other) candidate(s),
> present the case, or the case that it *is* Harry.
Alla:
Love this question, love but unfortunately I abandoned my rule in not
reading other people responses before I do mine and I read
Potioncat's post. Hey, I LOVE Potioncat's posts, can't get enough of
them :)
So I have to agree with her, in part at least. I mean, I definitely
think that Harry has nightmares, we KNOW at least about some of them.
We hear he is dreaming about Graveyard in OOP, he gets this horrible
visions. Hugs Harry :)
So where I agree with Potioncat is that Dumbledore had nightmares and
that cave is a great indicator of that.
And I would even agree with Potioncat that Snape probably had
nightmares. I guess dead Lily pictured prominently in them. I hope he
had lots of them.
Let me think, I also think Sirius had nightmares about his suggestion
to make Peter a Secret keeper and his time in Azkaban. At the top of
my head, I cannot think of anybody else.
Oh wait, no, Molly, of course Molly. Her Boggart indicated what
nightmares she might have had.
>
> 2. Many readers feel that the death & burial of Dobby is a turning
> point in Harry's journey. What significance do you think there is,
> if any, in the fact that Harry prepared Dobby's grave without the
use
> of magic? Why does it lead to "understanding blossom[ing] in the
> darkness" [p. 387]?
Alla:
Oh I think it is very significant, I think it goes back to JKR saying
in interviews that she does not believe in magic or something like
that and that ending will reflect it or something like that. I guess
the idea is that nothing superficial ( if that is the right word)
will stand between Harry and Dobby, no silly wand waving stuff or
anything, just grief of one heart for another being.
> 3. What do you think of the description that "every drop of
> [Harry's] sweat and every blister felt like a gift to the elf who
had
> saved their lives" [p. 387]? What do you imagine Dobby would have
> thought of that?
Alla:
I think that Dobby would have appreciated that, but at the same time
he would really not have wanted great Harry Potter to work for him.
> 4. Why, after all this time and all the various efforts, has Harry
> *now* managed to "learn control at last... the very thing
Dumbledore
> had wanted him to learn from Snape" [p. 387]? Why does the death
> trigger this in Harry?
Alla:
Actually, heee, I think that this really really does not bode well
for Occlumency as the area of magic, I mean IMO the fact that death
triggers it in Harry shows that it is not very, well, good.
Like nothing else can make Harry to be succesful in that, what about
other people?
> 5. Is there significance to JKR's choice of "Nurmengard" as a name
> for the prison?
Alla:
What Potioncat said and yes, I felt for Grindelwald too.
> 6. Is there significance to the fact that Harry used the wand
which
> was Draco's, rather than the wand which was Bellatrix's, to etch
the
> words "Here lies Dobby, a Free Elf"?
Alla:
OMG, great point and I think it is subtle enough too. I do not think
he wanted to do this honor with Bella's wand, it was too dirty.
> 7. As you read this the first time, did you feel confident that
> Harry could know and not seek? Could YOU have known & not sought?
>
> 8. When Harry is talking in his mind as if to DD and asks if he is
> meant to know but not to seek, he also asks, "Did you know how hard
> I'd find that? Is that why you made it this difficult? So I'd
have
> time to work that out?" [p. 391] What do you think is the answer
to
> that? How about what you thought on your first read? Did you feel
a
> new understanding along with Harry, or had you see his mission
> differently than he had before this dawning?
Alla:
Honestly and truly, I do not get a great wisdom here, you know? I
mean, I certainly get Harry mastering the Hallows, figuring out about
the death, etc, but what Dumbledore tried to achieve here, I really
really do not know.
I mean deliberately slowing Harry down to make sure he does not do
anything rush I suppose? Here is the idea Dumbledore - do **not**
send him on this mission then in the first place.
I think Dumbledore played rather cruel game here personally and I do
not quite see the purpose.
> 9. Harry Potter has been derided by many for not being much of a
> thinker. He becomes a thinker in this chapter, and quite
decisive.
> What do you make of this? Is it a change? Did it surprise you?
Has
> it always been there?
Alla:
I loved it, I loved it sooo much, but no I do not think that it
surprised me much. Since I am rereading the books now I can see that
those bits and pieces about Harry being able to think deductively
were always there. Like in the first book he figured out stuff
several times despite being wrong about main villain.
> 11. What, in your opinion, was carried in Griphook's comment, "You
> are an unusual wizard, Harry Potter"? Do you think Harry is an
> unusual wizard? If so, in what way(s)?
Alla:
Certainly I do. I said it many times that I am fascinated that with
his horrible upbringing Harry is able to feel even brief pity for
Malfoy and even tiny bit of pity for Riddle. God knows that even
after books ended that is more than I was ever able to achieve about
Riddle. There is not one sympathetic thought I can come up about him.
So, yes, I certainly think that Harry's ability to love IS unusual
and no, by that I do not mean that he is the most loving person in
the world. I mean that I am fascinated that with the upbringing he
had, he was able to love **at all**.
> 14. When Harry said he understood bits of Voldemort and then went
on
> to say he wished he'd understood DD as much, were you surprised?
Why
> do you think he made this remark instead of sticking with Voldemort
> as the topic of his understanding?
Alla:
Because I think that despite Voldemort being forced upon Harry,
Dumbledore was the one with whom Harry was preocupied on voluntary
basis, Dumbledore was the one whom Harry really wanted to understand
and felt that it was necessary for his mission.
> 17. It has long been an interest of many just what Ollivander is
all
> about. Something about the way he described Voldemort
as "great"...
> something about how he made the hair stand up on Harry's neck....
In
> this chapter, we have Harry suddenly thinking about having been
> unsure how much he liked Ollivander back when they first met, and
> even now, "the idea of the Dark Lord in possession of this wand
> seemed to enthral him as much as it repulsed him" [p. 402]. And
yet
> Luna seems genuinely fond of him. What do you make of this man?
Alla:
Truly? No clue. I do think though that he has unhealthy fascination
of Voldemort. He was just tortured for crying out loud and he still
does that. Sigh.
>
> 18. How is it that, compared to the end of OOTP, Harry can be so
> certain the visions he's having are real? We know now that they
are,
> but how could he be so confident after what happened in OOTP?
Alla:
I really am not sure, actually. I would be interested to hear what
others say.
Thanks for the great questions :)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive