Muggles v wizards redux
a_svirn
a_svirn at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 13 10:37:17 UTC 2008
No: HPFGUIDX 183235
> Alla:
>
> Just adding something. Just as I cannot sympathize much with
muggles
> because they cannot do magic, I really am not identifying with
wizards
> because they CAN do magic, if that makes sense?
a_svirn:
Sure it does, but it seems to me that it is a completely different
issue. You are basically saying that muggles are just too
insignificant for the story to be bothered with. They are of course,
but they are there nevertheless, the ever-present foil to the
Wizarding world, and Rowling is *very* persistent in bringing them
up. I mean, OK for the Dursleys, but why on earth do we need the
entire chapter about the Muggle minister? Does it add anything
significant to the plot? Nope. If Rowling wanted us to understand
that the Muggle world is likewise affected by Voldemort she could
have Kingsley to say something relevant at the Order meeting. And yet
we are emphatically treated to a yet another show of muggle
inferiority, and invited to chuckle at the spectacle of their
humiliation. Moreover, we are told in the interview that it is a very
important chapter, one she wanted to squeeze in the second book
first, but saved for later. It looks like it is an imperative with
Rowling to show muggles as inferiors and she goes to considerable
lengths to achieve it. And much as I'd like not to bother about them,
thanks to Rowling's persistence I can't help doing just that.
a_svirn
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive