Muggles v wizards redux
a_svirn
a_svirn at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 14 12:43:16 UTC 2008
No: HPFGUIDX 183255
> Alla:
>
> No, I disagree with some of it. I do not remember Arthur making
> decisions for muggles or manipulating them.
a_svirn:
He obliviated them though, simply because they look askance at him at
the QWC. (Which was his fault incidentally.) He was also extremely
high-handed with the Dursleys. Do you believe that he would presume
to connect any wizarding fireplace to the network without asking them
first? Nope, I believe the correct procedure would be to ask their
permission to do so. After all it is their privacy is being invaded.
> Alla:
I would say that good
> wizard can be condescending to muggles, but that is pretty much it
in
> my opinion.
a_svirn:
It is bad enough. I don't know about you, but I hate being condensed
to.
> Alla:
> But I also wonder why you will not be satisfied that as long
> as you do not hurt another person, nobody will touch you? I
certainly
> would think that it is should be that way between wizards and
muggles
> and wizards etc.
a_svirn:
Define touch. I'd say constant mind-raping and manipulation is even
worse than physical injury.
> Alla:
>
> Right, well memory charms to random muggles, normally I would
agree,
> just hard to do so here.
a_svirn:
It is, isn't it? And this is just a matter of routine with good
wizards.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive