Horcrux Cheat by JKR? (Was Tom Riddle and the RoR)

[kempermentor]

No: HPFGUIDX 181886


> > Carol:
> > 
> > However, it does seem that he used "fresh" murders for the 
> > creation of Horcruxes. ...
> > 
> > (I've changed the order given on Mugglenet to reflect the probable
> > order in which they were created.)
> > 
> > The diary - Moaning Myrtle
> > The ring - Tom Riddle Sr.
> > The cup - Hepzibah Smith, the previous owner
> > The locket - a Muggle tramp
> > The diadem - an Albanian peasant
> > Nagini - Bertha Jorkins 

> Mike:
> Thanks for re-ordering the list into chronological order, Carol. 
> ...
 
> > Carol:
> > The Prophecy seems to have spurred him to hide any Horcruxes that
> > he still had with him, including the locket and the diary. As for
> > Nagini, she didn't need to be hidden. She could be controlled.
 
> Mike:
> I concur with your speculation on the prophecy impetus. And I bow to 
> your wisdom in picking Nagini as a Horcrux, I thought she was a red 
> herring. I still wonder if the story about LV's Four Founders 
> obsession was fruitful. True, he did get Helga's cup and Salazar's 
> locket, and Rowena's diadem came out in DH. But I don't understand 
> LV giving up that four-fold quest in favor of using Nagini, 
> no matter how "dear" to him the snake was.

Kemper now:
If he feared for his Horcruxes as reasonably suggested by Carol, why
didn't he create the seventh Horcrux prior to that Halloween?
Was Harry suppose to be the 7th murder for the 7th Horcrux?
If so, what was the object to encase the soul?
I wonder if LV found something of Gryffindor's.  Rowena's daughter,
the Grey Lady, has existed almost as long if not longer than Hogwarts.
 I imagine she has much information.  Perhaps she gave up more than
the diadem.  But as I type this, the Bloody Baron seems the most
accessible to young Tom Riddle.  

Kemper, who wonders why Hogwarts a History isn't more accurate with
Helena and the Baron floating around or living since the beginning