[HPforGrownups] Re: Horcrux Cheat by JKR? (Was Tom Riddle and the RoR)

Janette jnferr at gmail.com
Thu Mar 6 13:14:01 UTC 2008


No: HPFGUIDX 181926

> Carol:
> And I resisted Harry!crux with every argument I could come up with. I
> still don't think he was a true Horcrux since no encasing spell was
> performed on him. Accidental Horcrux or quasi-Horcrux or something
> like that, but he doesn't act like the diary or locket Horcruxes, or
> Nagini (who must already have had some sort of affinity with
> Voldemort), and I don't think it's solely because he had his own
> "pure" soul. I think it's also because he wasn't a true, spell-encased
> Horcrux.


montims:

Oh my goodness.  Duh.  Is THAT why DD didn't think Harry could be killed by
LV or anyone/thing else, and why he was so reckless with him in the game
plan?  Of course!  A horcrux can only be destroyed in a certain way, using
certain "tools".  Ironically, if it hadn't been for Fawkes, Harry would then
have been out in the first test (and LV one horcrux down), as the basilisk's
venom is one of those tools...


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





More information about the HPforGrownups archive