Hmmm. What's your favorite *now*?
Jerri/Dan Chase
danjerri at madisoncounty.net
Tue May 27 17:26:51 UTC 2008
No: HPFGUIDX 183043
One thing I find interesting as we discuss which of the HP books are
our personal favorites, is that some people are talking about which
books are "best". Am I alone in seeing a major difference? I would
not consider ranking one of these books as "better" or "worse" than
another. I have my personal favorite, and the one that gives me the
most dissatisfaction. But I won't say that PoA is "better" than DH.
PoA appeals more to me, but that doesn't mean that I consider DH to be
a "bad" book.
And, in fact, the series is more like one monster story divided into
seven volumes. The first books are necessary parts.
It's sort of like a house. I spend a lot more time in the top floor
of my house than I do in the foundations, but the foundations aren't
bad, without them the rest of the house, including the top floor
wouldn't be worth much!
I would never consider advising anyone to read the later books without
reading the earlier ones. I suppose that someone who has seen the
movies could start with PoA or there abouts and get something out of
the later books. But to me SS/PS and CoS are necessary building
blocks to the entire series.
My interpretation, and obviously not that of others.
Jerri
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive