Slytherin's Reputation was Re: CHAPDISC: DH, EPILOGUE
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 2 01:50:49 UTC 2009
No: HPFGUIDX 185595
Pippin:
<SNIP>
Snape certainly had good reasons to dislike Harry based on what he
knew of James. But his prejudice kept him from noticing any of the
ways in which Harry was not like James. Perfectly understandable, IMO,
but if we don't think that was okay, how can we think it's okay to
hate Slytherins? <SNIP>
Alla:
Maybe the analogy with deciding to hate James' son on the spot works
for you, but it certainly does not work for me. Harry **met** Draco
Malfoy his classmate and Draco Malfoy is the one based on whom he
formed the opinion about Slytherin, well for the most part anyway. We
also have Snape of course, who treated him so lovely during the first
lesson.
There is also that matter that I do not think that Snape's hatred of
James is completely justified either, but that is an aside.
Harry certainly formed an opinion of the whole house based on the few
representatives of it and in real life I would say that he should
check out other people before judging whole house, except, where are
those people exactly?
Where are the students who do not think and do like Draco Malfoy
does? Yes, I know people argued about invisible Slytherins that
exist and are good people ( the examples given were just name
characters). To me they are not part of the story except being there
in name only. To me author meant for me to form an opinion of the
whole Slytherin student body based on selected few.
Oh and I did not say that my friend's opinion was something I agreed
with, just something I totally understood.
Laura says:
We don't know all of any of the houses. I think the ones we do know
are meant to be representative of the whole.
Alla:
Totally totally agreed. And when JKR wanted us to see that really not
all Gryffindors are brave and lovely, she showed Pettigrew to us,
loud and clear.
I did not see anybody like that in the current Slytherin generation,
I am sure they exist if it was real world and we saw heroic Slyths in
DH. But even they initially ALL followed it, no?
If I do not see anybody in Slytherin house who not follows pureblood
supremacy ideology, I assume they all do. Because as I am sure I
mentioned it before, when character who is so so minor makes it clear
that he shares it, I think it was done very deliberately (when he
substitutes for Draco during Quidditch match in HBP. I even forgot
his name and too lazy to look it up).
It is not right to generalize in RL based on selected few,
understandable, but not right at all. In fiction however we often
meant to, I think. And if we are not, author will let me know.
Again, even despite all the heroic Slyths I saw, for some reason I
really did not feel that JKR pulled a rug about it on me.
JMO,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive