Disarming spell WAS: Re: Wandlore and more

[pippin_999]

No: HPFGUIDX 185415


Carol: 
> What does not make sense--to me--is the DE's assumption that only
> Harry would use Expelliarmus. True, he must have seen him use it in
> the graveyard, but it's a highly useful spell. (Snape taught it to
the entire short-lived duelling club.) 

Pippin:
As we learned in OOP, expelliarmus has a reputation as wimpy. One can
see why. It's easily learned, doesn't require a lot of magical power,
and doesn't cause pain, disability or disfigurement. 

In consequence, most wizards don't take it seriously. It's literally
kid stuff. The DE's know that no Auror or Order member would think of
using it in a serious fight. 

Harry's success may change that -- but its general usefulness may be
limited if wizards are prepared for it. IIRC, Harry  usually managed
to keep hold of his wand if he was expecting an attempt to disarm him. 

Most wizards seem to have one or two spells that they favor in combat
--which makes sense. The wizard with a specialty will strike while the
other guy  is  making up his mind.

Pippin