Wand allegiance.

[kamion53]

No: HPFGUIDX 187257

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "eggplant107" <eggplant107 at ...> wrote:
>
> "kamion53" <kersberg@> wrote:
> 
> > this is next to one of the strongest items occuring in HP also the
> > most sloppy executed.
> 
> I respectfully disagree. In every book starting from book 1
> JKR emphasized over and over again that the wand chooses the
> wizard. More than once I wondered why she was making such a
> big point about it; In book 7 I found out exactly precisely why.
> I think the lady knew what she was doing from day one.
> 
> "Damit Lazarus" <lkotur@> wrote:
> 
> > Possible plot hole.
> 
> I don't think so. I think a plot hole is when the average reader cannot hope to come up with a logical explanation about one aspect of the story. If that is what a plot hole is then this is not one.  I will not insult the intelligence of readers by explaining exactly why a play fight would not change wand allegiances, and fortunately JKR was not that patronizing either.
> 
> Eggplant
>

kamion53 to lkutur@
emphasizing how important it is that the wand chooses the wizard from chapter 5 book1 on and then not taking care of the effects of forcefully taking over wands when it happens through 7 book, but only make a big tamaly in the last about it 
is sloppy executing of a law you set yourself in your work by my book.

kamion to Eggplant
please insult my intelligence by explaining why there are different laws for playfight and fights to the death conisering the wands mechanics and functioning.The fights by the student were serious enough to be taken serious.
Do wands set themself on "playmode" when kids are making "just mischief"?