[HPforGrownups] Re: Secrets (Long) OLD POST REPOST
k12listmomma
k12listmomma at comcast.net
Fri May 1 18:18:51 UTC 2009
No: HPFGUIDX 186398
Alla:
Do you agree or disagree that central drive of the series was to uncover
what happened that night in GH? Do you think that the key of Harry's
maturity was to know everything and to understand everything, or something
different?
Because really especially in light of recent discussions, I think that the
key to Harry's maturity was to understand that he does not need to know
everything and some things are better taken on faith, etc. However, we did
learn A LOT of secrets with Harry, so I do not know.
Shelley:
I think it is the first- it's not necessarily the KEY to his maturity, but
certainly Harry had to know and understand what had happened "to him" or
about him so that he could understand his purpose in life- to be the one to
end Voldemort, and so yes, that mission was part of his maturity. But to
know and understand everything of the motives and actions of "others"
(namely Dumbledore and Snape), I think part of Harry's maturity is to accept
that he doesn't know, and doesn't always need to know, all the juicy details
of the lives of others.
Snape's revelations, in fact, I found to be more of Rowling appeasing to the
fan base who were demanding that Rowling explain who Snape was, when in
reality, Harry wouldn't have found out the facts of his childhood (abused
child, witness his teenage father torturing a teenage Snape) and Harry
wouldn't have been privileged to know Snape's pure memories of promising to
guard Harry after being so in love with his mother, making a deal with
Dumbledore and the reason why he became a double agent to put his life at
risk in the hands of Voldemort. Because of these revelations, Harry matures
a lot, but the reasons/purpose for these revelations were not to mature a
Harry as much as tell a story to the readers who we demanding to know the
Snape-story.
With Dumbledore's past, we find Harry angry that Dumbledore didn't share his
past with Harry, but really, that part of Harry is being (unreasonably)
selfish. Being who Dumbledore was- headmaster and very busy- he didn't have
time as a retired grandpa to sit with the youngsters and spin tales of days
gone past, and so it's unreasonable of Harry to think that Dumbledore even
had to the time to explain all of his youth to Harry, let alone have the
need to. Part of Harry's maturity in that situation is just to accept that
he didn't need to have all the explanations of who Dumbledore was to just
trust him, like the others did in the Order of the Phoenix. Part of his
maturing was to understand that he was meddling in someone's private life to
seek all those answers, and to accept that if that person wants to share
their failures and early life, that's their priority and right to keep that
to themselves.
Real kids grow up not knowing or understanding the motives of the adults
around them who make decisions for them, and in this respect, the whole
series of Harry Potter is unrealistic. I think it might have been more
intriguing to have Harry not know the Snape-story, and grow up and mature
anyway, and then do a side story of Snape and his motives from his angle, so
that the two remain separate and we get the full picture (or more of it) as
two separate journeys. Instead, Rowling pulls a convenient trick of Snape
not-dead-yet, and Harry confidently-there-at-the-right-time to have Snape
pull out his memories to give to Harry, and I found that to be unrealistic.
Snape had no reason to give Harry any memories- as a selfish git he was
portrayed all his life, I would have expected him not to. Snape was never
one to share his life- I didn't expect him to start the moment he was going
to die. Again, I think it was for the sake of the readers the Rowling has
Snape pull a very unusual stunt for him- to tell Harry of his personal
motives. Harry would have matured anyway without knowing. I think I would
have respected Harry a lot more if he forgave Snape out of the pure motive
of that forgiveness is the right thing to do, rather than to have Harry
forgive Snape simply because he didn't know all the rest of the story
before, and that he had been wrong about Snape. I think I would have liked
the story better if we had Harry mature, forgive Snape, and then have a
delay "will" of Snape be delivered to Harry in the form of Snape's memories
so that Harry comes to understand that his forgiveness really did match up
with what he should have done.
But, for the record, I think Harry is wrong to forgive Snape, or rather, if
I were in Harry's shoes, I wouldn't have forgiven Snape to the degree that
Harry does. For me, I may have understood Snape's motives, but that in no
way would have made me see him the way that Harry does, to forgive him so
completely that he rewrites all of what Snape does as a "hero" and have
admiration to the degree of naming my child after this loser, and to seek to
repaint his picture for the rest of the WW that he was really a double-spy
working for Dumbledore. I just can't see myself doing any of those things
that Harry did, but this is Rowling's story she's telling and not mine.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive