[HPforGrownups] Re: Dumbledore/ and Voldemort and Harry

[dorothy dankanyin]

No: HPFGUIDX 190976

Alla:

> I actually would like to change subject a bit if you do not mind and go 
> back to Voldemort supposedly not being able to harm Harry after he took 
> Harry's blood. Do you think that his torture of Harry *after* he took 
> Harry's blood does not constitute harm either?
>
> See why I am still confused over this whole subject of "blood"?

Dorothy:
  I thought the only thing Harry's blood did for Vodemort was to enable him 
to touch Harry.  I never figured it protected either of them after that.
  I see here that many others feel it did being that it was a protection for 
Harry when his mother died "for him".  Did I miss something somewhere?