MOVIE: Comparisons
Geoff
geoffbannister123 at btinternet.com
Thu Jul 21 21:07:58 UTC 2011
No: HPFGUIDX 191019
May I start in case it seems otherwise, by saying that I am not biased in
favour either medium: book or film. I have said in previous posts that
my route to meeting Harry was via a film COS, which I saw just after
release at the end of 2002. This rapidly led me into the books and I
shall celebrate eight years as a member of HPFGU next month. So, I
have no axe to grind.
"Deathly Hallows Part 2" was released in UK cinemas last Friday.
Unfortunately, no one from Warners bothered to check with me for
my approval because I was just coming to the end of a week's holiday
on the Isles of Scilly, which are just off the far south-west English
coast and have no cinema.
:-(
Because of family commitments, I wasn't able to see it until Wednesday
evening and then had to drive 25 miles to the nearest town with a cinema.
Before I went, I had read a dozen or so reviews, seen about every trailer
I could get my hands on, plus a British ITV1 programme "Behind the
Scenes of Deathly Hallows Part 2". Having looked at all this, I went with
a sense of foreboding and trepidation that what I called in a recent post
the "David Yates Syndrome" might appear in that the story would be
altered and spurious scenes inserted. After the film, I drove home through
sometimes rain-lashed Somerset roads mulling over the evening.
My general reaction was that I had enjoyed the film and although there
were some tweaks which had been made, it followed the story line well,
except
.
for the final confrontation between Harry and Voldemort,
which I think moved disastrously away from the canon story. But why?
I have maintained on a number of occasions that, to me, chapters 33-36
of DH represent JKR's finest writing. I will often sit and read just those
chapters. In the film, I though the first three were good- especially the
forest scenes and King's Cross; the story then gets slightly altered up
to Voldemort producing Harry's "body". But the crunch comes when
Harry revealed himself to be still alive, there is this chase through the
halls up to on of the higher levels of Hogwarts when they come face to
face and Harry pulls Voldemort off the top with him. There appears to be
some sort of Apparition; I'm not sure who is doing it and the smoke trails
which represent this in the films seem to be going all over the place with
a crash landing in the courtyard. We have this long wand battle,
reminiscent of GOF with Voldemort finally being defeated and his body
disintegrating. It almost seems to be just one more scene in the slam-bang
battle we have watched for the previous hour.
What a comparison to the book. Here, Harry reveals that he is alive
whereupon, the crowd falls silent and forms a circle. My imagination
sees something like a Roman gladiatorial contest. They circle, waiting to
pounce, audience holding their collective breath as Harry prods Voldemort
towards doubt and uncertainty with revelations about the Horcruxes and
the Elder Wand and then, there is for me that stunning and ecstatic moment
when the rising sun comes across the window sill, and the spells are fired
which end the duel. I think, for me, the link of sunrise and the end of evil
reminds me strongly my Christian faith which may be why that scene moves
me so much. It is so much more a fitting closure than the rather
hidden-away and downbeat closing crafted by the David Yates.
Just as an aside, I was puzzled by the spells used by Voldemort, which
rebounded on him and that used by Molly Weasley to literally demolish
Bellatrix. they did not seem to be the normal sort. I was reminded of the
death of Quirrell long ago in PS when he appeared to become dust, which
had a curious familiarity with a scene at the beginning of Star Trek: Nemesis.
I wonder how many of you share my thoughts that our canon was poorly
served in that particular ending to what, in parallel to the books, has been
for me a usually pleasurable experience.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive