(This will be a rrather short post.  My apologies in advance.)

On Wed, 14 March 2001, "Scott" wrote:

> The way I see it if Harry uses AK to kill Voldemort then he is stooping to Voldemort's level and is therefore no better than the evil he is destroying. Then again I am strongly against violence of any kind. I'm not saying that Voldemort SHOULDN'T be destroyed but just that I think it would be counter productive to show Harry doing it and then be lauded as a hero. (Even if he personally feels guilt.)

This is why I don't think Harry will be the one to kill Voldemort.  I think he will have ample opportunity, but not be able to do it.  That's when Peter will step in and kill Voldemort for him.

If someone has already postulated this theory, I apologize pprofusely for thinking I was original. <g>

Jeralyn, the Voicelady
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Oh, obvious," said Granny.  "I'll grant you it's 
obvious.  Trouble is, just because things are obvious 
doesn't mean they're true."
Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_____________________________________________________________
This email message was sent via MailStation(tm) - a trademark 
of CIDCO Incorporated.